Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 14;17(1):166.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0883-0.

The relationship between catastrophic health expenditure and health-related quality of life

Affiliations

The relationship between catastrophic health expenditure and health-related quality of life

Seung Hyun Kang et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of our study was to investigate the relationship between catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in general population.

Methods: We used Korean Health Panel Survey data from 2011 to 2013, which included data from 8850 baseline participants of 19 years of age or older. We defined CHE as total annual out-of-pocket health payment that was 40% greater than the household's capacity to pay. HRQoL was measured using the EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). We used generalized estimating equations to perform a longitudinal regression analysis.

Results: A total of 4.5% of the participants (n = 398) experienced CHE. Those with CHE tended to have a lower EQ-VAS index score compared with those without CHE (β: - 1.34, p = 0.013). A subgroup analysis revealed that individuals experiencing CHE had significant decreases as the number of chronic diseases increased (three or more, β: - 1.85, p = 0.014).

Conclusions: Catastrophic health expenditure influences HRQoL, which was more pronounced in patient with chronic disease. The efforts should focus on people who suffer from excessive health expenditures and chronic diseases.

Keywords: Catastrophic health expenditure; Chronic disease; Health-related quality of life; Out-of-pocket health payment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Korea Health Panel Survey data is openly published. Thus, ethical approval was not required for this study. This study did not require informed consent from the participants, as their information was fully anonymized and unidentified prior to analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of participant selection process

References

    1. Ferrans CE. Outcomes Assessment in cancer: Measures, Methods, and Applications. 2005. Definitions and conceptual models of quality of life; pp. 14–30.
    1. Grad FP. The preamble of the constitution of the World Health Organization. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80:981. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Department of Health and Human Services . Healthy people 2020 framework: The Vision, Mission and goals of healthy people 2020. Washington, DC: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2012.
    1. McHorney CA. Health status assessment methods for adults: past accomplishments and future challenges 1. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:309–335. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.309. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG. Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2000;56:899–905. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00858-X. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources