Longitudinal follow-up of 100 patients at risk of intrauterine growth retardation: comparison of diagnosis in two periods

Abstract

The concept of low birth weight includes two different entities: prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation. Both of them are major public health problems, because they increase perinatal morbidity and mortality Early diagnosis of IUGR leads to adequate decisions, making possible a reduction in perinatal morbidity and mortality. In order to make an early diagnosis of IUGR, clinical methods have proven to be insufficient. Ultrasonography is an important aid to this diagnosis, introducing the measurement of fetal diameters and perimeters. This study, designed to compare both methods, was carried out in at the Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France. Data processing was done in CLAP-PAHO/WHO. In the first period, retrospective analyses of 116 clinical histories with IUGR were performed. In this study, only fetal diameters were used and the accuracy of clinical and ultrasonographic diagnosis was evaluated. In the second period a prospective longitudinal follow-up study of 100 pregnant women at risk of developing IUGR was carried out. Clinical diagnosis was also evaluated, and compared to the ultrasonographic approach. The parameters used were the fetal diameters and perimeters (head and abdominal perimeters, and their relationship). Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the ultrasonic parameters were calculated (table I). The clinical and ultrasonographic diagnosis of both periods were compared with the purpose to analyze the effect of the measurement of fetal perimeters in the diagnostic accuracy. Newborns of the 100 patients in the prospective study were classified into two groups according to birth weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)