Usefulness of colonic tattooing using indocyanine green in patients with colorectal tumors
- PMID: 30430118
- PMCID: PMC6232564
- DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.632
Usefulness of colonic tattooing using indocyanine green in patients with colorectal tumors
Abstract
Aim: To prove that tattooing using indocyanine green (ICG) is feasible in laparoscopic surgery for a colon tumor.
Methods: From January 2012 to December 2016, all patients who underwent laparoscopic colonic surgery were retrospectively screened, and 1010 patients with colorectal neoplasms were included. Their lesions were tattooed with ICG the day before the operation. The tattooed group (TG) included 114 patients, and the non-tattooed group (NTG) was selected by propensity score matching of subjects based on age, sex, tumor staging, and operation method (n = 228). In total, 342 patients were enrolled. Between the groups, the changes in [Delta (Δ), preoperative-postoperative] the hemoglobin and albumin levels, operation time, hospital stay, oral ingestion period, transfusion, and perioperative complications were compared.
Results: Preoperative TG had a shorter operation time (174.76 ± 51.6 min vs 192.63 ± 59.9 min, P < 0.01), hospital stay (9.55 ± 3.36 d vs 11.42 ± 8.23 d, P < 0.01), and post-operative oral ingestion period (1.58 ± 0.96 d vs 2.81 ± 1.90 d, P < 0.01). The Δ hemoglobin (0.78 ± 0.76 g/dL vs 2.2 ± 1.18 g/dL, P < 0.01) and Δ albumin (0.41 ± 0.44 g/dL vs 1.08 ± 0.39 g/dL, P < 0.01) levels were lower in the TG. On comparison of patients in the "N0" and "N1 or N2" groups, the N0 colon cancer group had a better operation time, length of hospital stay, oral ingestion period, Δ hemoglobin, and Δ albumin results than those of the N1 or N2 group. The operation methods affected the results, and laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) showed similar results. However, for left and right hemicolectomy, both groups showed no difference in operation time or hospital stay.
Conclusion: Preoperative tattooing with ICG is useful for laparoscopic colectomy, especially in the N0 colon cancer group and LAR.
Keywords: Colorectal neoplasm; Endoscopic tattoo; Indocyanine green; Laparoscopic surgery; Perioperative.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Ulrich A, Reissman P. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery-are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:723–727. - PubMed
-
- Miyoshi N, Ohue M, Noura S, Yano M, Sasaki Y, Kishi K, Yamada T, Miyashiro I, Ohigashi H, Iishi H, et al. Surgical usefulness of indocyanine green as an alternative to India ink for endoscopic marking. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:347–351. - PubMed
-
- Price N, Gottfried MR, Clary E, Lawson DC, Baillie J, Mergener K, Westcott C, Eubanks S, Pappas TN. Safety and efficacy of India ink and indocyanine green as colonic tattooing agents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:438–442. - PubMed
-
- ASGE Technology Committee. Kethu SR, Banerjee S, Desilets D, Diehl DL, Farraye FA, Kaul V, Kwon RS, Mamula P, Pedrosa MC, Rodriguez SA, Wong Kee Song LM, Tierney WM. Endoscopic tattooing. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:681–685. - PubMed
-
- Fu KI, Fujii T, Kato S, Sano Y, Koba I, Mera K, Saito H, Yoshino T, Sugito M, Yoshida S. A new endoscopic tattooing technique for identifying the location of colonic lesions during laparoscopic surgery: a comparison with the conventional technique. Endoscopy. 2001;33:687–691. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
