Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;33(9):2794-2801.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6567-4. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

The PINCH-Phone: a new screenings method for recurrent incisional hernias

Affiliations

The PINCH-Phone: a new screenings method for recurrent incisional hernias

Nadine van Veenendaal et al. Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Debate persists on the optimal management of incisional hernias due to paucity of accurate recurrence rates. Reoperation rates implicate a severe underestimation of the risk of a recurrence. Therefore, long-term postoperative clinic visits allowing physical examination of the abdomen are deemed necessary. However, these are time and costs consuming. Aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new screenings method for recurrent hernias, the 'PINCH-Phone' (Post-INCisional-Hernia repair-Phone).

Methods: The PINCH-Phone is a telephone questionnaire. In this multicenter prospective study, the PINCH-Phone was answered by patients after incisional hernia repair. Afterwards the patients were seen at the clinic and physical examination was done to detect any recurrences.

Results: The PINCH-Phone questions were answered by 210 patients with a median postoperative follow-up of 36 months. Fifty-six patients were seen after multiple incisional hernia repairs. In 137 patients who had replied positively to one or more questions, 28 recurrent incisional hernias were detected at physical examination. Six recurrences were noted in 73 patients who had replied negatively to all questions. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the PINCH-Phone were 82% and 38%, respectively.

Conclusion: The PINCH-Phone appears a simple and valuable screenings method for recurrences after incisional hernia repair and, hence, is recommended for implementation.

Keywords: Hernia surgery; Incisional hernias; Patient-reported outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jaap Bonjer received grants and personal fees from Medtronic, Johnson&Johnson, Olympus, Applied Medical, and Stryker, outside the submitted work. Nadine van Veenendaal, Marijn Poelman, Baukje van den Heuvel, Boudewijn Dwars, Hermien Schreurs, and Jan Stoot have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the study

References

    1. Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg. 1985;72(1):70–71. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720127. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, Franck A, Kieser M, Büchler MW, Knaebel HP. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2009;249(4):576–582. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec6c8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bloemen A, van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, Hoofwijk AG. Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure. Br J Surg. 2011;98(5):633–639. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7398. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rogmark P, Smedberg S, Montgomery A. Long-term follow-up of retromuscular incisional hernia repairs: recurrence and quality of life. World J Surg. 2018;42(4):974–980. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4268-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nieuwenhuizen J, Kleinrensink GJ, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Indications for incisional hernia repair: an international questionnaire among hernia surgeons. Hernia. 2008;12(3):223–225. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0322-4. - DOI - PubMed