Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;92(1094):20180726.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180726. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Population-based opportunistic osteoporosis screening: Validation of a fully automated CT tool for assessing longitudinal BMD changes

Affiliations

Population-based opportunistic osteoporosis screening: Validation of a fully automated CT tool for assessing longitudinal BMD changes

Perry J Pickhardt et al. Br J Radiol. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Methods:: The automated BMD tool was retrospectively applied to non-contrast abdominal CT scans in 1603 consecutive asymptomatic adults (mean age, 55.9 years; 770 M/833 F) undergoing longitudinal screening (mean interval, 5.7 years; range, 1.0-12.3 years). The spinal column was automatically segmented, with standardized L1 and L2 anterior trabecular ROI placement. Automated and manual L1 HU values were compared, as were automated supine-prone measures. L1-L2 CT attenuation values were converted to BMD values through a linear regression model. BMD values and changes were assessed according to age and gender.

Results:: Success rate of the automated BMD tool was 99.8 % (four failed cases). Both automated supine vs prone and manual vs automated L1 attenuation measurements showed good agreement. Overall mean annual rate of bone loss was greater in females than males (-2.0% vs -1.0%), but the age-specific rate declined faster in females from age 50 (-2.1%) to age 65 (-0.3%) compared with males (-0.9% to -0.5%). Mean BMD was higher in females than males at age 50 (143.6 vs 135.1 mg cm-3), but post-menopausal bone loss in females reversed this relationship beyond age 60. By age 70, mean BMD in females and males was 100.8 and 107.7 mg cm-3 , respectively.

Conclusion:: This robust, fully automated CT BMD tool allows for both individualized and population-based assessment. Mean BMD was lower in men than women aged 50-60, but accelerated post-menopausal bone loss in women resulted in lower values beyond age 60.

Advances in knowledge:: This fully automated tool can be applied to routine abdominal CT scans for prospective or retrospective opportunistic BMD assessment, including change over time. Mean BMD was lower in men compared with women aged 50-60 years, but accelerated bone loss in women during this early post-menopausal period resulted in lower BMD values for women beyond age 60.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Dr Pickhardt serves as an advisor to Bracco and is a shareholder in SHINE and Elucent.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Automated CT BMD tool in asymptomatic 59-year-old male at initial evaluation, evaluated over a 10-year interval. (A) 3D volume-rendered image from the initial CT scan performed in 2007 when the patient was 59 years old shows the relative placement of the automated ROI (green cylinder) within the anterior trabecular space of the L1 vertebral body. (B) Collage of 2D transverse images at the L1 level from CT in 2007 (top row) and 2017 (bottom row). Bone windows (left images) and soft tissue windows (middle images) are shown, as well as placement of the automated ROI (green ovals) with resulting mean HU values (right images). The HU values correspond to an estimated BMD of 186.9 mg cm3 in 2006 and 131.6 mg cm3 in 2016, reflecting a 30% loss, or annual mean rate of BMD change of −3%/year. Note also the significant interval weight loss. 3D, three-dimensional; BMD, bone mineral density; ROI, region of interest.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Automated supine vs prone measurements (A), Plot of automated BMD measurement of the supine vs prone CT series (r2 = 0.90) (B), Corresponding Bland–Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement. No bias is noted. BMD, bone mineral density.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Manual vs automated L1 trabecular attenuation measurements in 588 subjects. (A) Plot of manual single-slice ROI and automated volumetric measurements for L1 trabecular attenuation (in HU). (r2 = 0.80). (B) Corresponding Bland–Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement. Note that the automated measures are approximately 5 HU higher on average, without bias according to variation of the mean. HU, Hounsfield unit; ROI, region of interest.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Automated mean BMD values at initial CT according to age and gender. Plots using lines of best fit show that males have lower BMD values on average in the 50–60 age range, whereas females have lower values on average at older ages. The shaded areas around lines correspond to the 95% CIs for the mean BMD values. BMD, bone mineral density.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Annual rates of BMD change according to age at initial CT and gender. BMD, bone mineral density.

Comment in

  • Letter to the Editor.
    Engelke K, Keaveny TM. Engelke K, et al. Br J Radiol. 2019 Jul;92(1099):20190115. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190115. Epub 2019 Jun 6. Br J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31170815 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Graffy PM, Lee SJ. A crisis in the treatment of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2016; 31: 1485–7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2888 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Black DM, Rosen CJ, Osteoporosis P. Clinical practice. postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 254–62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1513724 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Delzell ES, Randall S, et al. . The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29: 2520–6. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2269 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siris ES, Adler R, Bilezikian J, Bolognese M, Dawson-Hughes B, Favus MJ, et al. . The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group. Osteoporos Int 2014; 25: 1439–43. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2655-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: Prevalence, benefits, challenges, and opportunities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 209: 94–102. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17864 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types