Intraoperative assessment of tubules in predicting microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in men with Sertoli cell-only syndrome
- PMID: 30442056
- PMCID: PMC6381476
- DOI: 10.1177/0300060518809257
Intraoperative assessment of tubules in predicting microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in men with Sertoli cell-only syndrome
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the value of measuring the tubule diameter during microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in predicting outcomes in patients with Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS).
Methods: Fifty-six consecutive patients with SCOS were included. Patients were classified into two groups on the basis of the diameter of seminiferous tubules measured against 5/0 surgical suture (≥100 µm or <100 µm).
Results: The sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm was significantly lower than that in those with <100 µm (3.1% vs. 25.0%). The SRR from the contralateral testis in men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm was lower than that in those with <100 µm (0% vs. 14.3%). Men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm had a significantly larger testis and lower follicle-stimulating hormone levels than did men with <100 µm (8.1 ± 2.4 vs. 5.3±1.8 mL, 19.9 ± 9.7 vs. 25.9 ± 7.1 mIU/mL, respectively).
Conclusions: The diameter of tubules is a useful predictor for a successful SRR in men with SCOS. Intraoperative assessment of homogeneous large tubules allows some men to perform a limited (superficial) contralateral micro-TESE after no spermatozoa are initially identified.
Keywords: Nonobstructive azoospermia; Sertoli cell-only syndrome; microdissection; microdissection testicular sperm extraction; seminiferous tubule diameter; sperm retrieval.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Heterogenicity of testicular histopathology and tubules as a predictor of successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(22):e10914. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010914. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 29851822 Free PMC article.
-
Intrasurgical parameters associated with successful sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction.Andrology. 2021 Nov;9(6):1864-1871. doi: 10.1111/andr.13082. Epub 2021 Jul 26. Andrology. 2021. PMID: 34289247
-
Clinical comparison between conventional and microdissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia: Understanding which treatment works for which patient.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Jun 30;90(2):130-135. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.2.130. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018. PMID: 29974723
-
Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review.Andrology. 2014 Jan;2(1):20-4. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00148.x. Epub 2013 Nov 6. Andrology. 2014. PMID: 24193894
-
Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1099-103.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1136. Epub 2015 Aug 8. Fertil Steril. 2015. PMID: 26263080
Cited by
-
Revisiting non-obstructive azoospermia: Is there a best way to retrieve testicular sperm?Reprod Med Biol. 2025 Feb 6;24(1):e12632. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12632. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2025. PMID: 39917553 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Azoospermic men with isolated elevation of folliclestimulating hormone represent a specific subpopulation of patients with poor reproductive outcomes.Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2022 Mar;49(1):62-69. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2021.04623. Epub 2022 Jan 28. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2022. PMID: 35172538 Free PMC article.
-
Sertoli cell-only syndrome: etiology and clinical management.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Mar;38(3):559-572. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02063-x. Epub 2021 Jan 11. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021. PMID: 33428073 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol 1989; 142: 62–65. - PubMed
-
- Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, et al. Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1457–1460. - PubMed
-
- Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 131–135. - PubMed
-
- Amer M, Ateyah A, Hany R, et al. Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in obstructive non-azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 653–656. - PubMed
-
- Amer M, Zohdy M, Abd El Naser T, et al. Single tubule biopsy: a new objective microsurgical advancement for testicular sperm retrieval in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 592. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources