Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;47(2):722-729.
doi: 10.1177/0300060518809257. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

Intraoperative assessment of tubules in predicting microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in men with Sertoli cell-only syndrome

Affiliations

Intraoperative assessment of tubules in predicting microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in men with Sertoli cell-only syndrome

Yang Yu et al. J Int Med Res. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the value of measuring the tubule diameter during microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in predicting outcomes in patients with Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS).

Methods: Fifty-six consecutive patients with SCOS were included. Patients were classified into two groups on the basis of the diameter of seminiferous tubules measured against 5/0 surgical suture (≥100 µm or <100 µm).

Results: The sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm was significantly lower than that in those with <100 µm (3.1% vs. 25.0%). The SRR from the contralateral testis in men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm was lower than that in those with <100 µm (0% vs. 14.3%). Men with a tubule diameter ≥100 µm had a significantly larger testis and lower follicle-stimulating hormone levels than did men with <100 µm (8.1 ± 2.4 vs. 5.3±1.8 mL, 19.9 ± 9.7 vs. 25.9 ± 7.1 mIU/mL, respectively).

Conclusions: The diameter of tubules is a useful predictor for a successful SRR in men with SCOS. Intraoperative assessment of homogeneous large tubules allows some men to perform a limited (superficial) contralateral micro-TESE after no spermatozoa are initially identified.

Keywords: Nonobstructive azoospermia; Sertoli cell-only syndrome; microdissection; microdissection testicular sperm extraction; seminiferous tubule diameter; sperm retrieval.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Histopathology of (A) hypospermatogenesis, (B) maturation arrest, and (C) Sertoli cell-only syndrome.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Photograph showing seminiferous tubules that are larger in diameter than 5/0 surgical sutures (100 µm). (B) Photograph showing seminiferous tubules that are smaller than 5/0 surgical sutures.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol 1989; 142: 62–65. - PubMed
    1. Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, et al. Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1457–1460. - PubMed
    1. Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 131–135. - PubMed
    1. Amer M, Ateyah A, Hany R, et al. Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in obstructive non-azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 653–656. - PubMed
    1. Amer M, Zohdy M, Abd El Naser T, et al. Single tubule biopsy: a new objective microsurgical advancement for testicular sperm retrieval in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 592. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources