Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 15;15(1):111.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0744-7.

Targeted retail coupons influence category-level food purchases over 2-years

Affiliations

Targeted retail coupons influence category-level food purchases over 2-years

Xintong Guan et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: Targeted coupons strongly influence purchasing behavior and may represent an innovative approach for improving dietary behaviors.

Methods: The retail analytics firm, Dunnhumby, provided secondary retail data containing grocery transactions, targeted coupon exposures, and coupon use for 2500 households over 2-years. The USDA Quarterly At-Home Food Purchasing Database was used to categorize individual foods into 52 categories and combined into 12 food groups. Mixed effects linear models estimated the difference-in-difference effects of coupon exposure on category-level purchase rate/wk. pre- and post-campaign; models also tested effect modification by food category.

Results: Category-level food purchases significantly increased post-campaign. Mean (SD) food purchases/wk. Among exposed households (17.34 (13.08) units/wk) vs. unexposed households (3.75 (4.59) units/wk) were higher (p < 0.001). Difference-in-difference effects of coupon exposure showed a higher increase in purchase rate among exposed vs. unexposed households (5.73 vs. 0.67, p < 0.001). Food category significantly modified the association between coupon exposure and coupon campaign. Category-level purchase rate among exposed vs. unexposed households was relatively higher in less healthful (e.g. convenience foods) vs. more healthful categories (e.g. nuts) with a 1.17 unit/wk. increase in convenience foods purchase (p < 0.001) vs. a 0.03 unit/wk. increase in nuts (p < 0.001). Exploratory analyses suggested that price elasticity of food categories for targeted coupons (1.02-2.81) was higher than previous estimates for untargeted coupons.

Conclusion: Across food categories, coupon exposure increased category-level purchase rate, with a relatively larger effect size for less healthful than more healthful categories. Promising results from this preliminary study suggest that experimental research is warranted to determine whether targeting with the explicit purpose of improving dietary quality can more effectively influence diet, and whether it can do so more cost effectively.

Keywords: Dietary pattern; Difference-in-difference; Grocery purchases; Healthful food purchase; Incentives; Intervention; Longitudinal; Retail purchase quality; Targeted coupon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effect of targeted coupons on purchase rate for all foods. Differences in mean food purchase rate per week pre- and post- a targeted coupon campaign among 2500 households exposed vs. unexposed to a targeted coupon campaign. Exposed households are represented with a solid line and unexposed households are represented with a dashed line. The pre-campaign period describes the period prior to the coupon campaign (day<=223); the post-campaign period describes the period after the coupon campaign began (223 < day< 642)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of targeted coupons on purchase rate for each food category. Figures are divided into two groups: less healthful foods and more healthful foods. Mean food purchases per week at food category level among exposed households vs. unexposed households pre- and post-campaign are shown through solid and dash lines. Exposed households are represented with a solid line and unexposed households are represented with a dashed line. The pre-campaign period describes the period prior to the coupon campaign (day<=223); the post-campaign period describes the period after the coupon campaign began (223 < day< 642)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. department of. Agriculture . 2015–2020 dietary guidelines for Americans. 8 2015.
    1. Johnson NB, Hayes LD, Brown K, Hoo EC, Ethier KA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005–2013. 2014. - PubMed
    1. Contento IR, Balch GI. The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy. J Nutr Educ. 1995;27:277–418.
    1. Graham DJ, Orquin JL, Visschers VHM. Eye tracking and nutrition label use: a review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement. Food Policy. 2012;37:378–382. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.03.004. - DOI
    1. Seattle will tax sugary soda — but not diet. The Seattle Times https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/seattle-city-council-.... Accessed 5 June 2017.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources