Targeted retail coupons influence category-level food purchases over 2-years
- PMID: 30442148
- PMCID: PMC6238299
- DOI: 10.1186/s12966-018-0744-7
Targeted retail coupons influence category-level food purchases over 2-years
Abstract
Background: Targeted coupons strongly influence purchasing behavior and may represent an innovative approach for improving dietary behaviors.
Methods: The retail analytics firm, Dunnhumby, provided secondary retail data containing grocery transactions, targeted coupon exposures, and coupon use for 2500 households over 2-years. The USDA Quarterly At-Home Food Purchasing Database was used to categorize individual foods into 52 categories and combined into 12 food groups. Mixed effects linear models estimated the difference-in-difference effects of coupon exposure on category-level purchase rate/wk. pre- and post-campaign; models also tested effect modification by food category.
Results: Category-level food purchases significantly increased post-campaign. Mean (SD) food purchases/wk. Among exposed households (17.34 (13.08) units/wk) vs. unexposed households (3.75 (4.59) units/wk) were higher (p < 0.001). Difference-in-difference effects of coupon exposure showed a higher increase in purchase rate among exposed vs. unexposed households (5.73 vs. 0.67, p < 0.001). Food category significantly modified the association between coupon exposure and coupon campaign. Category-level purchase rate among exposed vs. unexposed households was relatively higher in less healthful (e.g. convenience foods) vs. more healthful categories (e.g. nuts) with a 1.17 unit/wk. increase in convenience foods purchase (p < 0.001) vs. a 0.03 unit/wk. increase in nuts (p < 0.001). Exploratory analyses suggested that price elasticity of food categories for targeted coupons (1.02-2.81) was higher than previous estimates for untargeted coupons.
Conclusion: Across food categories, coupon exposure increased category-level purchase rate, with a relatively larger effect size for less healthful than more healthful categories. Promising results from this preliminary study suggest that experimental research is warranted to determine whether targeting with the explicit purpose of improving dietary quality can more effectively influence diet, and whether it can do so more cost effectively.
Keywords: Dietary pattern; Difference-in-difference; Grocery purchases; Healthful food purchase; Incentives; Intervention; Longitudinal; Retail purchase quality; Targeted coupon.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The Grocery Purchase Quality Index-2016 Performs Similarly to the Healthy Eating Index-2015 in a National Survey of Household Food Purchases.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jan;119(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.08.165. Epub 2018 Nov 7. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019. PMID: 30413342
-
Do purchases of price promoted and generic branded foods and beverages vary according to food category and income level? Evidence from a consumer research panel.Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104481. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104481. Epub 2019 Oct 4. Appetite. 2020. PMID: 31589906
-
Association Between County-Level Food Retail and Socioeconomic Environment and Nutritional Quality of Household Food Purchases, 2015.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023 May;123(5):796-808. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.10.015. Epub 2022 Oct 28. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023. PMID: 37096644 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Consumption and Purchases of Healthier Foods in Retail Environments: A Systematic Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;17(20):7524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207524. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33081130 Free PMC article.
-
Retail Nutrition Programs and Outcomes: An Evidence Analysis Center Scoping Review.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Sep;121(9):1866-1880.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.080. Epub 2020 Nov 20. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021. PMID: 33229206
Cited by
-
Influence of Food and Beverage Companies on Retailer Marketing Strategies and Consumer Behavior.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 10;17(20):7381. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207381. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33050424 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Food marketing, eating and health outcomes in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Nutr. 2025 Mar 28;133(6):781-805. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524000102. Epub 2025 Jun 16. Br J Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40518855 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of supermarket automated electronic sales data for population dietary surveillance.Nutr Rev. 2022 May 9;80(6):1711-1722. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab089. Nutr Rev. 2022. PMID: 34757399 Free PMC article.
-
How causal machine learning can leverage marketing strategies: Assessing and improving the performance of a coupon campaign.PLoS One. 2023 Jan 11;18(1):e0278937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278937. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36630398 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of the consumer and neighbourhood food environment on dietary intake and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review of causal impact studies.Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;299:114879. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114879. Epub 2022 Mar 10. Soc Sci Med. 2022. PMID: 35290815 Free PMC article.
References
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. department of. Agriculture . 2015–2020 dietary guidelines for Americans. 8 2015.
-
- Johnson NB, Hayes LD, Brown K, Hoo EC, Ethier KA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005–2013. 2014. - PubMed
-
- Contento IR, Balch GI. The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy. J Nutr Educ. 1995;27:277–418.
-
- Graham DJ, Orquin JL, Visschers VHM. Eye tracking and nutrition label use: a review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement. Food Policy. 2012;37:378–382. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.03.004. - DOI
-
- Seattle will tax sugary soda — but not diet. The Seattle Times https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/seattle-city-council-.... Accessed 5 June 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources