Targeted retail coupons influence category-level food purchases over 2-years
- PMID: 30442148
- PMCID: PMC6238299
- DOI: 10.1186/s12966-018-0744-7
Targeted retail coupons influence category-level food purchases over 2-years
Abstract
Background: Targeted coupons strongly influence purchasing behavior and may represent an innovative approach for improving dietary behaviors.
Methods: The retail analytics firm, Dunnhumby, provided secondary retail data containing grocery transactions, targeted coupon exposures, and coupon use for 2500 households over 2-years. The USDA Quarterly At-Home Food Purchasing Database was used to categorize individual foods into 52 categories and combined into 12 food groups. Mixed effects linear models estimated the difference-in-difference effects of coupon exposure on category-level purchase rate/wk. pre- and post-campaign; models also tested effect modification by food category.
Results: Category-level food purchases significantly increased post-campaign. Mean (SD) food purchases/wk. Among exposed households (17.34 (13.08) units/wk) vs. unexposed households (3.75 (4.59) units/wk) were higher (p < 0.001). Difference-in-difference effects of coupon exposure showed a higher increase in purchase rate among exposed vs. unexposed households (5.73 vs. 0.67, p < 0.001). Food category significantly modified the association between coupon exposure and coupon campaign. Category-level purchase rate among exposed vs. unexposed households was relatively higher in less healthful (e.g. convenience foods) vs. more healthful categories (e.g. nuts) with a 1.17 unit/wk. increase in convenience foods purchase (p < 0.001) vs. a 0.03 unit/wk. increase in nuts (p < 0.001). Exploratory analyses suggested that price elasticity of food categories for targeted coupons (1.02-2.81) was higher than previous estimates for untargeted coupons.
Conclusion: Across food categories, coupon exposure increased category-level purchase rate, with a relatively larger effect size for less healthful than more healthful categories. Promising results from this preliminary study suggest that experimental research is warranted to determine whether targeting with the explicit purpose of improving dietary quality can more effectively influence diet, and whether it can do so more cost effectively.
Keywords: Dietary pattern; Difference-in-difference; Grocery purchases; Healthful food purchase; Incentives; Intervention; Longitudinal; Retail purchase quality; Targeted coupon.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. department of. Agriculture . 2015–2020 dietary guidelines for Americans. 8 2015.
-
- Johnson NB, Hayes LD, Brown K, Hoo EC, Ethier KA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005–2013. 2014. - PubMed
-
- Contento IR, Balch GI. The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy. J Nutr Educ. 1995;27:277–418.
-
- Graham DJ, Orquin JL, Visschers VHM. Eye tracking and nutrition label use: a review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement. Food Policy. 2012;37:378–382. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.03.004. - DOI
-
- Seattle will tax sugary soda — but not diet. The Seattle Times https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/seattle-city-council-.... Accessed 5 June 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
