Utilization of Continuous Cardiac Monitoring on Hospitalist-led Teaching Teams
- PMID: 30443470
- PMCID: PMC6235649
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3300
Utilization of Continuous Cardiac Monitoring on Hospitalist-led Teaching Teams
Abstract
Guidelines for continuous cardiac monitoring (CCM) have focused almost exclusively on cardiac diagnoses, thus limiting their application to a general medical population. In this study, a retrospective chart review was performed to identify the reasons that general medical patients, cared for on hospitalist-led inpatient teaching teams between April 2017 and February 2018, were initiated and maintained on CCM, and to determine the incidence of clinically significant arrhythmias in this patient population. The three most common reasons for telemetry initiation were sepsis (24%), arrhythmias (12%), and hypoxia (10%). Most patients remained on telemetry for more than 48 hours (62%) and a significant number of patients were on telemetry until they were discharged from the hospital (39%). Of the cumulative total of more than 20,573 hours of CCM provided to this patient population, 37% of patients demonstrated only normal sinus rhythm and 3% had a clinically significant arrhythmia that affected management.
Keywords: continuous cardiac monitoring; high value care; hospitalist; telemetry.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Recommended guidelines for in-hospital cardiac monitoring of adults for detection of arrhythmia. Emergency Cardiac Care Committee Members, Jaffe AS, Atkins JM, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1431–1433. - PubMed
-
- Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Drew BJ, Califf RM, Funk M, et al. Circulation. 2005;110:2721–2746. - PubMed
-
- Impact of cardiac telemetry on patient safety and cost. Benjamin EM, Klugman RA, Luckmann R, Fairchild DG, Abookire SA. https://www.ajmc.com/journals/issue/2013/2013-1-vol19-n6/impact-of-cardi... Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:0. - PubMed
-
- The use and effectiveness of electrocardiographic telemetry monitoring in a community hospital general care setting. Curry JP, Hanson CW, Russell MW, Hanna C, Devine G, Ochroch EA. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1483–1487. - PubMed
-
- Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and cardiac arrest outcomes in 8,932 telemetry ward patients. Schull MJ, Redelmeier DA. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:647–652. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous