Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Satisfaction After Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy
- PMID: 30443480
- PMCID: PMC6232721
- DOI: 10.1177/2192568218765398
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Satisfaction After Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objectives: It is estimated that 10 000 patients seek medical care due to cervical radiculopathy every year in Denmark. Although the natural course is usually favorable, around 20% undergo surgery for cervical degenerative disease every year in Denmark. We aim to evaluate the patient-reported results and satisfaction of anterior cervical decompression and fusion over a 5-year period from a single Danish center for spine surgery.
Methods: This study is a retrospective study based on prospectively collected data from 318 consecutive patients treated with anterior cervical decompression and fusion over 1 to 3 levels. Data in the DaneSpine registry was collected pre- and postoperatively, and at 1 year after surgery. The outcome measures were Neck Disability Index (NDI), European Quality of Life 5D (EQ-5D), visual analogue score (VAS), and Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS).
Results: Of 318 cases enrolled, 272 (85.5%) had follow-up data available at a minimum 1-year postoperatively. The mean preoperative NDI was 40.0 and improved to 22.7. Mean EQ-5D was 0.50 and improved to 0.70, and mean VAS arm was 60.4 improved to 26.4. All improvements were statistically significant. A total of 74.3% were back to work 1 year after surgery. Achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in VAS neck and SF-36 PCS was strongly correlated to patient satisfaction.
Conclusion: Patients who undergo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion can expect improvement in their pain and disability, with 74.3% of patients reporting a positive change in health status after surgery.
Keywords: ACDF; MCID; cervical; degenerative disc disease; outcome; radiculopathy; satisfaction.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312. Epub 2012 Nov 23. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013. PMID: 23176164
-
Preoperative mental health status may not be predictive of improvements in patient-reported outcomes following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):177-182. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.SPINE16472. Epub 2016 Sep 30. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 27689424
-
Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.444. Epub 2013 Sep 26. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 24076442
-
The duration of symptoms and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy.Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 28. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 25264315
-
Are Preoperative PHQ-9 Scores Predictive of Postoperative Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;33(10):E486-E492. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000985. Clin Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32250973
Cited by
-
Prospective, population-based study of occupational movements and postures of the neck as risk factors for cervical disc herniation.BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 28;12(2):e053999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053999. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35228284 Free PMC article.
-
Nonoperative management of degenerative cervical radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2022 Apr;66(1):74-84. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35655692 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.J Pain Res. 2022 May 17;15:1433-1441. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S359512. eCollection 2022. J Pain Res. 2022. PMID: 35607408 Free PMC article.
-
Improvement in Spine Pain, Functional Performance, and Quality of Life in a 26-Year-Old Male With a Failed Spine Fusion Surgery After Chiropractic BioPhysics® Structural Spinal Rehabilitation: A Case Report With a Six-Month Follow-Up.Cureus. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):e71544. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71544. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39417063 Free PMC article.
-
Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures with the Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Lateral Recess and Foraminal Stenosis.Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Apr 30;14(2):254-266. doi: 10.14444/7034. eCollection 2020 Apr. Int J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32355633 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Carette S, Fehlings MG. Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:392–399. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp043887. - PubMed
-
- Hartman J. Anatomy and clinical significance of the uncinate process and uncovertebral joint: a comprehensive review. Clin Anat. 2014;27:431–440. doi:10.1002/ca.22317. - PubMed
-
- Christensen AI, Ekholm O, Davidsen M, Juel K. Health and Sickness in Denmark 2010 & Development Since 1987. Copenhagen, Denmark: National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark; 2012.
-
- Wong JJ, Côté P, Quesnele JJ, Stern PJ, Mior SA. The course and prognostic factors of symptomatic cervical disc herniation with radiculopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J. 2014;14:1781–1789. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.032. - PubMed
-
- Bono CM, Ghiselli G, Gilbert TJ, et al. ; North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. Spine J. 2011;11:64–72. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.10.023. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources