Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017;2(1):33.
doi: 10.1007/s41109-017-0053-0. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

Network science approach to modelling the topology and robustness of supply chain networks: a review and perspective

Affiliations
Review

Network science approach to modelling the topology and robustness of supply chain networks: a review and perspective

Supun Perera et al. Appl Netw Sci. 2017.

Abstract

Due to the increasingly complex and interconnected nature of global supply chain networks (SCNs), a recent strand of research has applied network science methods to model SCN growth and subsequently analyse various topological features, such as robustness. This paper provides: (1) a comprehensive review of the methodologies adopted in literature for modelling the topology and robustness of SCNs; (2) a summary of topological features of the real world SCNs, as reported in various data driven studies; and (3) a discussion on the limitations of existing network growth models to realistically represent the observed topological characteristics of SCNs. Finally, a novel perspective is proposed to mimic the SCN topologies reported in empirical studies, through fitness based generative network models.

Keywords: Fitness based attachment; Network science; Supply chain network modelling; Supply network topology and robustness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.Not applicable.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of random, small-world and scale free networks. Topological structure of benchmark network models. Random and Small-world network topologies do not include hub nodes. In contrast, scale-free topologies are characterised by the presence of small number of highly connected hub nodes and a high number of feebly connected nodes. Presence of distinct hubs in scale-free networks make them more vulnerable to targeted attacks, compared to random and small-world networks
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Modelling Perspectives obtained from Generative and Evolving Network Models
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
General methodological framework of research on topology and robustness of SCNs
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Transitions from random to winner-take-all graphs observed as σ parameter is increased

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albert R, Barabási AL. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys. 2002;74(1):47. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47. - DOI
    1. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabási AL. Internet: diameter of the world-wide web. Nature. 1999;401(6749):130–131. doi: 10.1038/43601. - DOI
    1. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabási AL. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature. 2000;406:378–382. doi: 10.1038/35019019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barabási, A. L. (2014). Network science book. Boston: Center for Complex Network, Northeastern University. Available online at: http://barabasi.com/networksciencebook
    1. Barabási A-L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999;286(5439):509–512. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources