Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 15;110(19):1478-1486.
doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1413. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2011-2015: A focus on eye and ear defects

Affiliations

Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2011-2015: A focus on eye and ear defects

Erin B Stallings et al. Birth Defects Res. .

Abstract

Background/objectives: In this data brief, we examine major eye and ear anomalies (anophthalmia/microphthalmia, anotia/microtia, and congenital cataract) for a recent 5-year birth cohort using data from 30 population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States.

Methods: As a special call for data for the 2018 NBDPN Annual Report, state programs reported expanded data on eye/ear anomalies for birth years 2011-2015. We calculated the combined overall prevalence (per 10,000 live births) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the three anomalies as well as by maternal age, maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, laterality, presence/absence of other major birth defects, and case ascertainment methodology utilized by the program (active vs. passive).

Results: The overall prevalence estimate (per 10,000 live births) was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.5) for anophthalmia/microphthalmia, 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.6) for congenital cataract, and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.7-1.8) for anotia/microtia. Congenital cataract prevalence varied little by maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, or case ascertainment methodology; prevalence differences were more apparent across strata for anophthalmia/microphthalmia and anotia/microtia. Prevalence among active vs. passive ascertainment programs was 50% higher for anophthalmia/microphthalmia (1.9 vs. 1.2) and two-fold higher for anotia/microtia (2.6 vs. 1.2). Anophthalmia/microphthalmia was more likely than other conditions to co-occur with other birth defects. All conditions were more frequent among older mothers (40+ years).

Conclusions: This data brief provides recent prevalence estimates for anophthalmia/microphthalmia, congenital cataract, and anotia/microtia that address a data gap by examining pooled data from 30 population-based surveillance systems, covering a five-year birth cohort of about 12.4 million births.

Keywords: anophthalmia; anotia; birth defects; cataract; congenital; microphthalmia; microtia; population-based surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bhatti TR, Dott M, Yoon PW, Moore CA, Gambrell D, & Rasmussen SA (2003). Descriptive epidemiology of infantile cataracts in metropolitan Atlanta, GA, 1968–1998. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 157(4), 341–347. - PubMed
    1. Canfield MA, Langlois PH, Nguyen LM, & Scheuerle AE (2009). Epidemiologic features and clinical subgroups of anotia/microtia in Texas. Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 85(11), 905–913. - PubMed
    1. Canfield MA, Mai CT, Wang Y, O’Halloran A, Marengo LK, Olney RS, … Kirby RS, National birth defects prevention network. (2014). The association between race/ethnicity and major birth defects in the United States, 1999–2007. Am J Public Health, 104(9), e14–e23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chambers TM, Agopian AJ, Lewis RA, Langlois PH, Danysh HE, Weber KA, . Lupo PJ. (2018). Epidemiology of anophthalmia and microphthalmia: Prevalence and patterns in Texas, 1999–2009. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 176, 1810–1818 [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed
    1. Daly L (1992). Simple SAS macros for the calculation of exact binomial and Poisson confidence limits. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 22(5), 351–361. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms