Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Nov 16;13(11):e0207725.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207725. eCollection 2018.

Sequential organ failure assessment in predicting mortality after paraquat poisoning: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Sequential organ failure assessment in predicting mortality after paraquat poisoning: A meta-analysis

Wen Jie Wang et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score is commonly used to determine disease severity and predict prognosis in critically ill patients. However, the prognostic value of SOFA after acute paraquat (PQ) poisoning remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to study the capability of SOFA to predict mortality in patients with PQ poisoning. Databases that included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through May 2018. Six studies involving 946 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Study-specific odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and then ORs with 95% CIs were pooled for the estimation of the prognostic role of SOFA in patients with PQ poisoning. Results showed that higher SOFA in patients with PQ poisoning was related to severe mortality (OR = 8.14, 95%CI 4.26-15.58, p<0.001). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic OR, and area under the curve were 72% (95%CI 0.65-0.79), 75% (95%CI 0.65-0.83), 2.9 (95%CI 2.0-4.1), 0.37 (95%CI 0.28-0.41), 8 (95%CI 4-14), and 0.79 (95%CI 0.76-0.83), respectively. No evidence of publication bias was detected by funnel plot analysis and formal statistical tests. Sensitivity analyses showed no important differences in the estimates of effects. The high SOFA score (8.1-fold) was associated with severe mortality in patients with PQ poisoning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Risk of bias and applicability concerns.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot for the association of SOFA and mortality.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Risk of bias and applicability concerns.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Summary ROC curve for the 6 included studies.
Numbers in brackets are 95% CIs. AUC = area under ROC curve, SENS = sensitivity, SPEC = specificity.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Funnel plot of the publication bias test.
(A)Begg’s test; and (B) Egger’s test.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Sensitivity analysis of the relationship between SOFA and mortality.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gil HW, Hong JR, Jang SH, Hong SY. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach for acute paraquat intoxication. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(11):1441–9. 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.11.1441 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu WP, Lai MN, Lin CH, Li YF, Lin CY, Wu MJ. Addition of immunosuppressive treatment to hemoperfusion is associated with improved survival after paraquat poisoning: a nationwide study. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87568 10.1371/journal.pone.0087568 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang YJ, Yu BX, Wang NN, Li TG. Acute poisoning in Shenyang, China: a retrospective and descriptive study from 2012 to 2016. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e021881 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021881 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gao J, Feng S, Wang J, Yang S, Li Y. Prolonged methylprednisolone therapy after the pulse treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe paraquat poisoning: A retrospective analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(25):e7244 10.1097/MD.0000000000007244 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan JT, Letchuman Ramanathan G, Choy MP, Leela R, Lim BK. Paraquat poisoning: experience in hospital taiping (year 2008—october 2011). Med J Malaysia. 2013;68(5):384–8. . - PubMed

Publication types