Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jan 1;26(1):44-49.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy138.

Recruiting for a pragmatic trial using the electronic health record and patient portal: successes and lessons learned

Emily Pfaff  1 , Adam Lee  1 , Robert Bradford  1 , Jinhee Pae  1 , Clarence Potter  1 , Paul Blue  1 , Patricia Knoepp  1 , Kristie Thompson  2 , Christianne L Roumie  3 , David Crenshaw  4 , Remy Servis  4 , Darren A DeWalt  5
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Recruiting for a pragmatic trial using the electronic health record and patient portal: successes and lessons learned

Emily Pfaff et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: Querying electronic health records (EHRs) to find patients meeting study criteria is an efficient method of identifying potential study participants. We aimed to measure the effectiveness of EHR-driven recruitment in the context of ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness)-a pragmatic trial aiming to recruit 15 000 patients.

Materials and methods: We compared the participant yield of 4 recruitment methods: in-clinic recruitment by a research coordinator, letters, direct email, and patient portal messages. Taken together, the latter 2 methods comprised our EHR-driven electronic recruitment workflow.

Results: The electronic recruitment workflow sent electronic messages to 12 254 recipients; 13.5% of these recipients visited the study website, and 4.2% enrolled in the study. Letters were sent to 427 recipients; 5.6% visited the study website, and 3.3% enrolled in the study. Coordinators recruited 339 participants in clinic; 23.6% visited the study website, and 16.8% enrolled in the study. Five-hundred-nine of the 580 UNC enrollees (87.8%) were recruited using an electronic method.

Discussion: Electronic recruitment reached a wide net of patients, recruited many participants to the study, and resulted in a workflow that can be reused for future studies. In-clinic recruitment saw the highest yield, suggesting that a combination of recruitment methods may be the best approach. Future work should account for demographic skew that may result by recruiting from a pool of patient portal users.

Conclusion: The success of electronic recruitment for ADAPTABLE makes this workflow well worth incorporating into an overall recruitment strategy, particularly for a pragmatic trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The full ADAPTABLE informatics recruitment workflow.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Demographic breakdowns of the populations reached by each contact method.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Comparing the demographics of all active UNCHCS patients with the subset of patients who use My UNC Chart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Thadani SR, Weng C, Bigger JT, et al. Electronic screening improves efficiency in clinical trial recruitment. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 166: 869–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miotto R, Weng C.. Case-based reasoning using electronic health records efficiently identified eligible patients for clinical trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (e1): e141–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jensen PB, Jensen LJ, Brunak S.. Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 136: 395–405. - PubMed
    1. Schmickl CN, Li M, Li G, et al. The accuracy and efficiency of electronic screening for recruitment into a clinical trial on COPD. Respir Med 2011; 10510: 1501–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernandez AF, Fleurence RL, Rothman RL.. The ADAPTABLE trial and PCORnet: Shining light on a new research paradigm. Ann Intern Med 2015; 1638: 635–6. - PubMed

Publication types