Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):285.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0971-4.

The effectiveness of an integrated care pathway in geriatric rehabilitation among older patients with complex health problems and their informal caregivers: a prospective cohort study

Irma H J Everink  1 , Jolanda C M van Haastregt  2 , Frans E S Tan  3 , Jos M G A Schols  2   4 , Gertrudis I J M Kempen  2
Affiliations

The effectiveness of an integrated care pathway in geriatric rehabilitation among older patients with complex health problems and their informal caregivers: a prospective cohort study

Irma H J Everink et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: To improve continuity and coordination of care in geriatric rehabilitation, an integrated care pathway was developed and implemented in The Netherlands. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of this pathway on patients and informal caregivers.

Methods: Two cohorts of patients and their informal caregivers were prospectively recruited before implementation of the pathway (2011-2012) and after implementation of the pathway (2013-2014). Primary outcome measures were dependence in activities of daily living in patients (KATZ-15) and self-rated burden among informal caregivers (SRB-VAS). Secondary outcome measures were the frequency of performing extended daily activities, social participation, psychological well-being, quality of life and discharge location (patients) and quality of life and objective care burden (informal caregivers). Outcomes were measured at baseline, after three and after nine months.

Results: No effect was shown on the KATZ-15 after three and nine months. However, a larger percentage of patients were discharged home in the care pathway cohort (83% vs 58.1% after three months and 88.6% vs 67.4% after nine months; p = 0.004). Furthermore, after three months, patients from the care pathway cohort performed more extended daily activities (p = 0.014) and informal caregivers experienced a lower self-rated burden (p = 0.05). After nine months, these effects disappeared. No differences were found for the other outcome measures.

Conclusions: Due to the positive effects of the integrated care pathway, we are inclined to recommend implementing the care pathway in regular care. To have longer lasting effects among patients and informal caregivers, we suggest actively disseminating information about the pathway to primary care providers who are currently still unaware of its content.

Trial registration: ISRCTN90000867 (date of registration: 07-04-2016).

Keywords: Aged; Dependence in activities of daily living; Geriatric rehabilitation; Informal care; Integrated care; Pathway; Subacute care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study design and methods were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of University Hospital Maastricht (#11–4-020). All patients and informal caregivers provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of Patients through the Study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. McCloskey R. Functional and self-efficacy changes of patients admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation unit. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(2):186–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02978.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stucki G, Stier-Jarmer M, Grill E, Melvin J. Rationale and principles of early rehabilitation care after an acute injury or illness. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(7–8):353–359. doi: 10.1080/09638280400014105. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patrick L, Knoefel F, Gaskowski P, Rexroth D. Medical comorbidity and rehabilitation efficiency in geriatric inpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(11):1471–1477. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.4911239.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bachmann S, Finger C, Huss A, Egger M, Stuck AE, Clough-Gorr KM. Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c1718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1718. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Storm M, Siemsen IM, Laugaland K, Dyrstad DN, Aase K. Quality in transitional care of the elderly: key challenges and relevant improvement measures. Int J Integr Care. 2014;14:e013. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1194. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data