Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar;37(3):209-218.
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

Current controversies on the role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer

Affiliations
Review

Current controversies on the role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer

Roy Mano et al. Urol Oncol. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an important component of the multimodal treatment which cures most patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors. Considering the high cure rates achieved, research focus in recent years has been directed toward improving quality of life and decreasing long-term treatment related sequelae. Consequently, the role of RPLND has evolved over the past 3 decades in both low-stage and advanced testicular cancer. The use of RPLND in clinically stage I and low volume stage II disease may offer the advantages of treating retroperitoneal teratoma which is present in 15% to 20% of patients, avoiding chemotherapy and reducing the need for frequent imaging during follow-up. Similarly, ongoing studies are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of RPLND for the treatment of early stage seminoma to avoid the long-term effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RPLND is traditionally used for the treatment of residual masses >1 cm after completion of chemotherapy. Its role in subcentimeter residual masses remains somewhat controversial given the fact that 25% to 30% of these patients are found to harbor either teratoma or viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumors. The presence of teratoma increases the probability of teratoma in metastatic sites. Modified unilateral templates were developed based on early mapping studies with the aim of preserving antegrade ejaculation. Recent data suggests initial mapping studies underestimated the risk of contralateral retroperitoneal metastases which may reach 32%. Furthermore, antegrade ejaculation may be preserved in >95% of patients undergoing bilateral nerve sparing primary RPLND and >80% undergoing nerve-sparing PC-RPLND, which, in our view is the more prudent oncologic approach. Recently, multiple series have demonstrated the safety and short-term efficacy of minimally invasive RPLND; however, larger studies with prolonged follow-up are required to validate the long-term oncologic efficacy of newer techniques.

Keywords: Minimally invasive surgery; Postchemotherapy surgery; Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; Testicular germ cell tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Statement

None of the authors have anything to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
– Boundaries of full-template RPLND. The renal vessels form the superior boundary, the ureters form the lateral boundary, and the bifurcation of the iliac vessels forms the inferior boundary. IMA, inferior mesenteric artery; IVC, inferior vena cava; SMA, superior mesenteric artery. Obtained with permission from Thomas E. Keane, Sam D. Graham and Marc Goldstein, Glenn’s Urologic Surgery 8th edition, Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 2016.
Figure 2
Figure 2
– Right and left modified templates for RPLND. Several side-specific modified templates for patients with low-stage NSGCT have been proposed, with each including ipsilateral lymph nodes inferior to the renal hilum extending to the bifurcation of the iliac arteries. Right-sided templates include the interaortocaval region, and both avoid dissection below the contralateral IMA. Obtained with permission from Thomas E. Keane, Sam D. Graham and Marc Goldstein, Glenn’s Urologic Surgery 8th edition, Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 2016.

References

    1. Hanna NH, Einhorn LH. Testicular cancer--discoveries and updates. The New England journal of medicine. 2014;371:2005–16. - PubMed
    1. Rajpert-De Meyts E, McGlynn KA, Okamoto K, Jewett MA, Bokemeyer C. Testicular germ cell tumours. Lancet. 2016;387:1762–74. - PubMed
    1. Masterson TA, Cary C, Rice KR, Foster RS. The Evolution and Technique of Nerve-Sparing Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy. The Urologic clinics of North America. 2015;42:311–20. - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, Beard C, Bhayani S, Bolger GB, et al. Testicular Cancer, Version 2.2015. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2015;13:772–99. - PubMed
    1. Albers P, Siener R, Kliesch S, Weissbach L, Krege S, Sparwasser C, et al. Risk factors for relapse in clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: results of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group Trial. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2003;21:1505–12. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances