Real-time augmented model guidance for mandibular proximal segment repositioning in orthognathic surgery, using electromagnetic tracking
- PMID: 30447987
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.016
Real-time augmented model guidance for mandibular proximal segment repositioning in orthognathic surgery, using electromagnetic tracking
Abstract
It is essential to reposition the mandibular proximal segment (MPS) as close to its original position as possible during orthognathic surgery. Conventional methods cannot pinpoint the exact position of the condyle in the fossa in real time during repositioning. In this study, based on an improved registration method and a separable electromagnetic tracking tool, we developed a real-time, augmented, model-guided method for MPS surgery to reposition the condyle into its original position more accurately. After virtual surgery planning, using a complex maxillomandibular model, the final position of the virtual MPS model was simulated via 3D rotations. The displacements resulting from the MPS simulation were applied to the MPS landmarks to indicate their final postoperative positions. We designed a new registration body with 24 fiducial points for registration, and determined the optimal point group on the registration body through a phantom study. The registration between the patient's CT image and physical spaces was performed preoperatively using the optimal points. We also developed a separable frame for installing the electromagnetic tracking tool on the patient's MPS. During MPS surgery, the electromagnetic tracking tool was repeatedly attached to, and separated from, the MPS using the separable frame. The MPS movement resulting from the surgeon's manipulation was tracked by the electromagnetic tracking system. The augmented condyle model and its landmarks were visualized continuously in real time with respect to the simulated model and landmarks. Our method also provides augmented 3D coronal and sagittal views of the fossa and condyle, to allow the surgeon to examine the 3D condyle-fossa positional relationship more accurately. The root mean square differences between the simulated and intraoperative MPS models, and between the simulated and postoperative CT models, were 1.71 ± 0.63 mm and 1.89 ± 0.22 mm respectively at three condylar landmarks. Thus, the surgeons could perform MPS repositioning conveniently and accurately based on real-time augmented model guidance on the 3D condyle positional relationship with respect to the glenoid fossa, using augmented and simulated models and landmarks.
Keywords: Augmented model-guided surgery; Electromagnetic tracking tool; Mandibular proximal segment repositioning; Orthognathic surgery; Registration body; Tracking tool frame.
Copyright © 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[Mandibular condyle localization in orthognathic surgery based on mandibular movement trajectory and its preliminary accuracy verification].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Feb 18;56(1):57-65. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.01.010. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024. PMID: 38318897 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Virtual skeletal complex model- and landmark-guided orthognathic surgery system.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 May;44(5):557-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 26. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27012762
-
Quantitative Augmented Reality-Assisted Free-Hand Orthognathic Surgery Using Electromagnetic Tracking and Skin-Attached Dynamic Reference.J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Nov/Dec;31(8):2175-2181. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006739. J Craniofac Surg. 2020. PMID: 33136850
-
[Condylar positioning during mandibular orthognatic surgery].Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2014 Sep;115(4):245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.revsto.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jul 4. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2014. PMID: 25001548 Review. French.
-
Methods of mandibular condyle position and rotation center used for orthognathic surgery planning: a systematic review.J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jun;123(3):345-352. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jul 6. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022. PMID: 34237437
Cited by
-
[Mandibular condyle localization in orthognathic surgery based on mandibular movement trajectory and its preliminary accuracy verification].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Feb 18;56(1):57-65. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.01.010. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024. PMID: 38318897 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Revolutionizing Dental Care: A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications Among Various Dental Specialties.Cureus. 2023 Oct 14;15(10):e47033. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47033. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37965397 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Four-Dimensional Superimposition Techniques to Compose Dental Dynamic Virtual Patients: A Systematic Review.J Funct Biomater. 2023 Jan 6;14(1):33. doi: 10.3390/jfb14010033. J Funct Biomater. 2023. PMID: 36662080 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Electromagnetic surgical navigation in patients undergoing mandibular surgery.Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84129-5. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33633247 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-Assisted Maxillary Positioning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Feasibility and Accuracy Evaluation.J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 11;10(12):2596. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122596. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34208399 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources