Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user's guide
- PMID: 30448911
- PMCID: PMC8084633
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-2048-4
Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user's guide
Abstract
Purpose: The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical practice is increasing. Following the creation of a 'User's Guide to Implementing PRO Assessment in Clinical Practice' by the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL), volunteers from ISOQOL sought to create a Companion Guide to assist health care providers with the scientific and practical considerations involved in implementing and using PRO measures in clinical care by using information from real-world case studies. This paper summarizes the key issues presented in the Companion Guide.
Methods: Ten respondents, who were members of the ISOQOL's CP-SIG and worked in various clinical areas, participated in a survey or telephone interview. Participants were from Canada (n = 2), Denmark (n = 1), England (n = 2), Holland (n = 1), and the United States (n = 4).
Results: Based on the information provided by respondents, a Companion Guide was produced, organized according to the nine questions presented in the User's Guide. An additional section for key take-home messages was also provided. This guide provides examples of issues and considerations related to the implementation of PRO measures in clinical practice.
Conclusions: Respondents provided insight into their experiences and emphasized that PRO initiatives were likely to be more successful if there is purposeful, designed integration into clinical practice, meaningful substantive engagement with all stakeholders and access to necessary organizational resources. The ability to leverage existing technology as well as realistic and stakeholder consensus-driven expectations for planning and timing were also key to the successful implementation of PRO measures.
Keywords: Clinical practice; Guidelines; ISOQOL; Implementation; PRO; Patient-reported outcome.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient wellbeing: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724. - PubMed
-
- Boyce MB, Browne JP, & Greenhalgh J (2014). The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Quality and Safety, 23(6), 508–518. - PubMed
-
- Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Carrivick S, Magnall J, & Skevington SM (2009). Continence specialists use of quality of life information in routine practice: A national survey of practitioners. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 423–433. - PubMed
-
- Lohr KN, & Zebrack BJ (2009). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Challenges and opportunities. Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 99–107. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous