Accuracy of self-reported weight in the Women's Health Initiative
- PMID: 30449294
- PMCID: PMC10260511
- DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018003002
Accuracy of self-reported weight in the Women's Health Initiative
Abstract
Objective: To assess the extent of error present in self-reported weight data in the Women's Health Initiative, variables that may be associated with error, and to develop methods to reduce any identified error.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Forty clinical centres in the USA.ParticipantsWomen (n 75 336) participating in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS) and women (n 6236) participating in the WHI Long Life Study (LLS) with self-reported and measured weight collected about 20 years later (2013-2014).
Results: The correlation between self-reported and measured weights was 0·97. On average, women under-reported their weight by about 2 lb (0·91 kg). The discrepancies varied by age, race/ethnicity, education and BMI. Compared with normal-weight women, underweight women over-reported their weight by 3·86 lb (1·75 kg) and obese women under-reported their weight by 4·18 lb (1·90 kg) on average. The higher the degree of excess weight, the greater the under-reporting of weight. Adjusting self-reported weight for an individual's age, race/ethnicity and education yielded an identical average weight to that measured.
Conclusions: Correlations between self-reported and measured weights in the WHI are high. Discrepancies varied by different sociodemographic characteristics, especially an individual's BMI. Correction of self-reported weight for individual characteristics could improve the accuracy of assessment of obesity status in postmenopausal women.
Keywords: Accuracy; Measured weight; Self-reported weight; Validation.
Figures
), among 75 336 women participating in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS). *1 lb=0·454 kg
), among 75 336 women participating in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS); (
) represents the line of no difference. *1 lb=0·454 kgReferences
-
- Gorber SC, Tremblay M, Moher D et al. (2007) Diagnostic in obesity comorbidities – a comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev 8, 307–326. - PubMed
-
- Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK et al. (2002) Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr 5, 561–565. - PubMed
-
- Palta M, Prineas RJ, Berman R et al. (1982) Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. Am J Epidemiol 115, 223–230. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
