This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Review

. 2018 Oct;53(4):280-293.

doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

Breast Cancer Screening and Optimizing Recommendations

Rachael B Lancaster¹, Shannon Gulla², Jennifer De Los Santos³, Heidi Umphrey²

Affiliations

Affiliations

¹ Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL. Electronic address: rlancaster@uabmc.edu.
² MidSouth Imaging, Germantown, TN.
³ Department of Radiation Oncology, Grandview Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL. Electronic address: Jennifer.Delossantos@grandviewhealth.com.

PMID: 30449346
DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2018.08.002

Review

Breast Cancer Screening and Optimizing Recommendations

Rachael B Lancaster et al. Semin Roentgenol. 2018 Oct.

. 2018 Oct;53(4):280-293.

doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

Authors

Rachael B Lancaster¹, Shannon Gulla², Jennifer De Los Santos³, Heidi Umphrey²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL. Electronic address: rlancaster@uabmc.edu.
² MidSouth Imaging, Germantown, TN.
³ Department of Radiation Oncology, Grandview Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL. Electronic address: Jennifer.Delossantos@grandviewhealth.com.

PMID: 30449346
DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2018.08.002

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Kommentar zu „MAMMA – Brustkrebsscreeningprotokolle im Vergleich“.
Weigel S. Weigel S. Rofo. 2024 Sep;196(9):892-893. doi: 10.1055/a-2312-9435. Epub 2024 Aug 15. Rofo. 2024. PMID: 39146726 German. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Screening for Breast Cancer.
Niell BL, Freer PE, Weinfurtner RJ, Arleo EK, Drukteinis JS. Niell BL, et al. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 Nov;55(6):1145-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2017.06.004. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28991557 Review.
Physicians discuss ramifications of studies pointing to breast cancer overdiagnosis: New research under way attempts to better define who should be screened and treated.
Printz C. Printz C. Cancer. 2017 Dec 1;123(23):4525-4527. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31118. Cancer. 2017. PMID: 29149513 No abstract available.
Breast Screening with US Transmission Imaging: A New Approach Yielding Old Results.
Mann RM. Mann RM. Radiology. 2024 Jun;311(3):e241074. doi: 10.1148/radiol.241074. Radiology. 2024. PMID: 38888483 No abstract available.
Trio of mammography studies demonstrate enhanced screening effectiveness: Recent research on the use of adjunctive technologies and expanded-age screening provides promising results for women with dense breasts.
Nierengarten MB. Nierengarten MB. Cancer. 2021 Sep 15;127(18):3279-3280. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33862. Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34424543 No abstract available.
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Models and High-Risk Screening.
Barke LD, Freivogel ME. Barke LD, et al. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 May;55(3):457-474. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2016.12.013. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28411673 Review.

See all similar articles

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- ClinicalKey
- Elsevier Science
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information