Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 19;8(1):17052.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35229-2.

Inverse Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration in Elderly People without Vitamin D deficiency

Affiliations

Inverse Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration in Elderly People without Vitamin D deficiency

Chun-Min Wang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Vitamin D status is inversely associated with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Whether this is true in the elderly without vitamin D deficiency is rarely investigated. Our data source is a cross-sectional survey of 1,966 community-dwelling elderly Taiwanese in 2012. An overnight fasting blood were obtained for biochemistry variables. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D] concentration <20 ng/mL. MetS is defined using modified ATP-III criteria. Of 523 participants without vitamin D deficiency (Men/Women = 269/254, age = 76.0 ± 6.2 years old [65-102 years old]), mean 25(OH)D was 44.0 ± 11.1 ng/mL, and the MetS prevalence of MS was 46.5%. Serum 25(OH)D was negatively associated with osteocalcin, the homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index, body mass index (BMI), and glycated hemoglobin A1c. Participants with more MetS features have lower serum 25(OH)D and osteocalcin. Binary logistic regression models showed that 25(OH)D, physical activity, and osteocalcin were negatively independent MetS factors, but that the HOMA-IR index, BMI, and being female were positively independent factors. The risk of MetS was progressively lower along with the increased 25(OH)D concentration, even above 60 ng/mL. In conclusion, a low 25(OH)D concentration is an independent risk factor for MetS in elderly people without vitamin D deficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean serum 25(OH)D concentration (ng/mL) in 523 elderly without vitamin D deficiency but with 0 to 5 features of the metabolic syndrome. (Ptrend < 0.001).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean osteocalcin (ng/dL) concentration in 523 elderly without vitamin D deficiency but with 0 to 5 features of the metabolic syndrome (Ptrend < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean HOMA-IR index in 523 elderly without vitamin D deficiency but with 0 to 5 features of the metabolic syndrome (Ptrend < 0.001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in 523 elderly without vitamin D deficiency but with 0 to 5 features of the metabolic syndrome (Ptrend < 0.001).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Risk of metabolic syndrome by 5 subgroups of 25(OH)D concentration. Data was derived from Appendix 6. Model 1 (—): adjusted with all major variables, except body mass index and HOMA-IR index, Model 4(---): adjusted with all variables, include body mass index and HOMA-IR, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

References

    1. Cornier MA, et al. The metabolic syndrome. Endocr. Rev. 2008;29:777–822. doi: 10.1210/er.2008-0024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet. 2005;365:1415–1428. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66378-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gallagher JC. Vitamin D and aging. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2013;42(2):319–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2013.02.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Janssen HC, Samson MM, Verhaar HJ. Vitamin D deficiency, muscle function, and falls in elderly people. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002;75:611–615. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/75.4.611. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kulie T, Groff A, Redmer J, Hounshell J, Schrager S. Vitamin D: an evidence-based review. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2009;22:698–706. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090037. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types