Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 1;173(1):60-67.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3227.

Duration of Pediatric Clinical Trials Submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration

Affiliations
Review

Duration of Pediatric Clinical Trials Submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration

Kanecia O Zimmerman et al. JAMA Pediatr. .

Abstract

Importance: The increasing prevalence of pediatric chronic disease has resulted in increased exposure to long-term drug therapy in children. The duration of recently completed drug trials that support approval for drug therapy in children with chronic diseases has not been systematically evaluated. Such information is a vital first step in forming safety pharmacovigilance strategies for drugs used for long-term therapy in children.

Objective: To characterize the duration of clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for pediatric drug approvals, with a focus on drugs used for long-term therapy.

Design and setting: A review was performed of all safety and efficacy clinical trials conducted under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act or the Pediatric Research Equity Act and submitted to the FDA from September 1, 2007, to December 31, 2014, to support the approval of drugs frequently used for long-term therapy in children. Statistical analysis was performed from July 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017.

Main outcomes and measures: Maximum duration of trials submitted to support FDA approval of drugs for children.

Results: A total of 306 trials supporting 86 drugs intended for long-term use in children were eligible for the primary analysis. The drugs most commonly evaluated were for treatment of neurologic (25 [29%]), pulmonary (16 [19%]), and anti-infective (14 [16%]) indications. The median maximum trial duration by drug was 44 weeks (minimum, 1.1 week; maximum, 364 weeks). For nearly two-thirds of the drugs (52 [61%]), the maximum trial duration was less than 52 weeks. For 10 of the drugs (12%), the maximum trial duration was 3 years or more. Maximum duration of trials did not vary by therapeutic category, minimum age of enrollment, calendar year, or legislative mandate.

Conclusions and relevance: Pediatric clinical trials designed to sufficiently investigate drug safety and efficacy to support FDA approval are of relatively limited duration. Given the potential long-term exposure of patients to these drugs, the clinical community should consider whether new approaches are needed to better understand the safety associated with long-term use of these drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures:

Dr Smith reported receiving compensation for serving as a consultant for Astellas Pharma, Lediant, and Nestec. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT Diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Maximum Trial Duration by Therapeutic Category
The black lines represent the median duration per therapeutic category. Upper and lower bounds of the box represent the 75th (quartile 3 [Q3]) and 25th (quartile 1 [Q1]) percentiles, respectively. The whiskers represent the following values:Q3 + 1.5(Q3 − Q1) andQ1 − 1.5(Q3 − Q1). Outliers within each therapeutic category are denoted by circles.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Maximum Trial Duration by Age Category
The black lines represent the median duration per age group. Upper and lower bounds of the box represent the 75th (quartile 3 [Q3]) and 25th (quartile 1 [Q1]) percentiles, respectively. The whiskers represent the following values:Q3 + 1.5(Q3 − Q1) and Q1 − 1.5(Q3 − Q1). Outliers within age group category are denoted by circles.

Comment in

References

    1. Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder JS, Kauffman RE. Developmental pharmacology—drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(12):1157-1167. doi:10.1056/NEJMra035092 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allegaert K, Anderson BJ, Verbesselt R, et al. Tramadol disposition in the very young: an attempt to assess in vivo cytochrome P-450 2D6 activity. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(2):231-239. doi:10.1093/bja/aei170 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ginsberg G, Hattis D, Sonawane B, et al. Evaluation of child/adult pharmacokinetic differences from a database derived from the therapeutic drug literature. Toxicol Sci. 2002;66(2): 185-200. doi:10.1093/toxsci/66.2.185 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Madabushi R, Cox DS, Hossain M, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic basis for effective argatroban dosing in pediatrics. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51(1):19-28. doi:10.1177/0091270010365550 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mirochnick M, Capparelli E, Connor J. Pharmacokinetics of zidovudine in infants:a population analysis across studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;66(1):16-24. doi:10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70049-4 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types