[A Meta-analysis on the relations between short-term exposure to PM(2.5) and both mortality and related emergency visits in China]
- PMID: 30453443
- DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.10.019
[A Meta-analysis on the relations between short-term exposure to PM(2.5) and both mortality and related emergency visits in China]
Abstract
Objective: To carry out a quantitative estimate that related to the effects of short-term exposure to PM(2.5) on all-cause mortality and emergency visits in China by using the systematic review and Meta-analysis. Methods: We selected all the studies published before March 2018 from China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, PubMed and EMBASE and data on relative risk (RR), excess risk (ER) and their 95%CIs: appeared in these papers were extracted. According to the differences in the size or direction (heterogeneity) of the results, we computed summary estimates of the effect values using a random-effect or fixed effect model. We also conducted the subgroup analysis and Meta-analysis to have assessed the selected studies for the evidence of study bias. Results: A total of 33 original studies, indexed in databases, were identified. Among those studies, 39 sets of data on mortality and 4 sets of data on emergency were valid to show that within the daily concentration range from 47.7 to 176.7 μg/m(3), for 10 μg/m(3) increases in PM(2.5) concentrations, it would increase the daily numbers of deaths by 0.49% (95%CI: 0.39%-0.59%) and 0.30% (95%CI: 0.10%-0.51%) for all-cause deaths and all-cause emergency-room visits, respectively. For subgroup analysis, the combined effect of PM(2.5) in causing short-term all-cause deaths in the northern areas (ER=0.42%, 95%CI: 0.30%-0.54%) seemed lower than that in the southern areas (ER=0.63%, 95%CI: 0.44%-0.82%). The combined effect of PM(2.5) concentration below 75 μg/m(3) (ER=0.50%, 95%CI: 0.37%-0.62%) was higher than that of PM(2.5) concentration ≥75 μg/m(3) (ER=0.39%, 95%CI: 0.26%-0.52%). Conclusion: Within the concentration range from 47.7 to 176.7 μg/m(3), short-term exposure to current level of PM(2.5) might increase both the all-cause daily mortality and daily emergency visits in China.
目的: 利用Meta分析定量评价空气中粒径≤2.5 μm的颗粒物(PM(2.5))短期暴露与我国居民全因死亡和急诊之间的关系。 方法: 于2018年3月系统检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、PubMed和EMBASE收集相关文献,提取相对危险度(RR)、超额危险度(ER)及其95%CI,根据异质性检验结果,采用固定或随机效应模型对数据进行合并,并对其进行亚组分析、Meta回归和检验发表偏倚。 结果: 共纳入33篇原始文献,分别利用39组死亡数据和4组急诊量数据进行Meta分析,结果显示,在47.7~176.7 μg/m(3)的浓度范围内,PM(2.5)每上升10 μg/m(3),居民每日全因死亡增加0.49%(95%CI:0.39%~0.59%),全因急诊量增加0.30%(95%CI:0.10%~0.51%)。对死亡数据的亚组分析显示北方地区(ER=0.42%,95%CI:0.30%~0.54%)合并效应值低于南方地区(ER=0.63%,95%CI:0.44%~0.82%),研究期间PM(2.5)浓度<75 μg/m(3)地区的合并效应值(ER=0.50%,95%CI:0.37%~0.62%)高于PM(2.5)浓度≥75 μg/m(3)的地区(ER=0.39%,95%CI:0.26%~0.52%)。 结论: 在47.7~176.7 μg/m(3)的浓度范围内,PM(2.5)短期暴露可能与全因死亡和急诊量增加有关。.
Keywords: Air pollution; All-cause emergency room visits; All-cause mortality; Short-term effects.
Similar articles
-
Short-term effects of fine particulate air pollution on cardiovascular hospital emergency room visits: a time-series study in Beijing, China.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 May;89(4):641-57. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1102-6. Epub 2015 Nov 7. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016. PMID: 26547916
-
[Impact of fine particulate matters on the daily number of emergency visits and outpatient visits of 5 hospitals in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou, 2013-2015].Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 6;53(1):81-85. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.01.011. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 30605967 Chinese.
-
Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study).Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Oct;(171):5-86. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012. PMID: 23311234
-
Are current Chinese national ambient air quality standards on 24-hour averages for particulate matter sufficient to protect public health?J Environ Sci (China). 2018 Sep;71:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Feb 11. J Environ Sci (China). 2018. PMID: 30195691 Review.
-
Effects of ambient particulate matter on fasting blood glucose: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Environ Pollut. 2020 Mar;258:113589. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113589. Epub 2019 Nov 9. Environ Pollut. 2020. PMID: 31841764
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical