Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):1277.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6156-4.

Stigma reduction in relation to HIV test uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review

Affiliations
Review

Stigma reduction in relation to HIV test uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review

Subash Thapa et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: This realist review was conducted to understand how stigma is reduced in relation to HIV test uptake in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: A systematic search of eight databases resulted in 34 articles considered for synthesis. Data synthesis was guided by a preliminary programme theory and included coding the meaning units to develop themes or intervention pathways that corresponded to context-mechanism-outcome configurations.

Results: We found that the interventions produced an effect through two pathways: (a) knowledge leads to changes in stigmatizing attitudes and increases in HIV test uptake and (b) knowledge and attitudes lead to changes in stigmatizing behaviours and lead to HIV test uptake. We also found one competing pathway that illustrated the direct impact of knowledge on HIV test uptake without changing stigmatizing attitudes and behaviour. The identified pathways were found to be influenced by some structural factors (e.g., anti-homosexuality laws, country-specific HIV testing programmes and policies), community factors (e.g., traditional beliefs and practices, sexual taboos and prevalence of intimate partner violence) and target-population characteristics (e.g., age, income and urban-rural residence).

Conclusions: The pathways and underlying mechanisms support the adaptation of intervention strategies in terms of social context and the target population in LMICs.

Keywords: And stigma reduction interventions; Context-mechanism-outcome configurations; HIV test uptake; Low- and middle-income countries; Realist review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preliminary programme theory explaining the effect of stigma-reduction intervention strategies on HIV test uptake
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Systematic searching and selection of primary studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Programme theory illustrating mechanisms for stigma reduction in relation to the distal outcome of HIV test uptake
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pathways for stigma reduction in terms of HIV test uptake

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Unaids . Global AIDS Update 2016. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2016.
    1. UNAIDS: Prevention Gap Report. In.; 2016.
    1. Golub SA, Gamarel KE. The impact of anticipated HIV stigma on delays in HIV testing behaviors: findings from a community-based sample of men who have sex with men and transgender women in new York City. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2013;27(11):621–627. doi: 10.1089/apc.2013.0245. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Unaids: UNAIDS fact sheet on stigma and discrimination. In.; 2003.
    1. Latalova K, Kamaradova D, Prasko J. Perspectives on perceived stigma and self-stigma in adult male patients with depression. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:1399–1405. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S54081. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms