Patient characteristics and critical care workflow affect paging frequency in neurocritical care
- PMID: 30455134
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.144
Patient characteristics and critical care workflow affect paging frequency in neurocritical care
Abstract
Indicator of response urgency (page tag), paging domains, distribution of pages by time of the day, and factors associated with neurocritical care paging remain elusive and were examined in this study. We examined the association between patient, neurocritical care workflow characteristics, and paging domains on frequency of paging using Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and analysis of covariance. A total of 1852 patients generated 36,472 pages. The most common page tagging was "for your information" (n = 15067, 41.3%), while 2.8% (n = 1006) pages were tagged urgent. Paging was most frequent for cardiovascular (12.2%), pain, agitation, distress (6.9%) and sodium (5.3%) concerns. Paging frequency was highest for mechanically ventilated patients (p < 0.001), those with indwelling intracranial pressure monitor (p < 0.04), arterial catheter (p < 0.001), central venous access catheter (p < 0.001), and in those with lower Glasgow Coma Score (p < 0.001). Patients admitted between 18:00-06:00 (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.16-1.86) and 14:30-18:00 (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.86), and sodium (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.39-1.66), and cardiovascular concerns (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.32) were associated with higher night time paging frequency. Incorporating paging domains in daily workflow and their impact on outcome of paging on escalation of clinical care and patient outcomes warrants further examination.
Keywords: Communication; Domains; Intensive care unit; Neurocritical care; Nursing; Paging; Physicians; Workflow.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Is it time to rethink how we page physicians? Understanding paging patterns in a tertiary care hospital.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):992. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4844-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31870370 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Why do we still page each other? Examining the frequency, types and senders of pages in academic medical services.BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jan;26(1):24-29. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004587. Epub 2016 Jan 6. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017. PMID: 26740495
-
Differences in the response times of pages originating from the ICU.Chest. 1999 Oct;116(4):1019-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.4.1019. Chest. 1999. PMID: 10531168
-
Hospital text paging communication as a surgical quality improvement initiative.J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 1;213:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 21. J Surg Res. 2017. PMID: 28601337 Clinical Trial.
-
Brainstem Monitoring in the Neurocritical Care Unit: A Rationale for Real-Time, Automated Neurophysiological Monitoring.Neurocrit Care. 2017 Feb;26(1):143-156. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0298-y. Neurocrit Care. 2017. PMID: 27484878 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical Experience With a Dedicated Neurocritical Care Quality Improvement Program in an Academic Medical Center.Cureus. 2024 Jan 22;16(1):e52730. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52730. eCollection 2024 Jan. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38384632 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical