Diagnosis and referral delays in primary care for oral squamous cell cancer: a systematic review
- PMID: 30455220
- PMCID: PMC6355296
- DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X700205
Diagnosis and referral delays in primary care for oral squamous cell cancer: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: The incidence of oral cancer is increasing. Guidance for oral cancer from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is unique in recommending cross-primary care referral from GPs to dentists.
Aim: This review investigates knowledge about delays in the diagnosis of symptomatic oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in primary care.
Design and setting: An independent multi-investigator literature search strategy and an analysis of study methodologies using a modified data extraction tool based on Aarhus checklist criteria relevant to primary care.
Method: The authors conducted a focused systematic review involving document retrieval from five databases up to March 2018. Included were studies looking at OSCC diagnosis from when patients first accessed primary care up to referral, including length of delay and stage of disease at time of definitive diagnosis.
Results: From 538 records, 16 articles were eligible for full-text review. In the UK, more than 55% of patients with OSCC were referred by their GP, and 44% by their dentist. Rates of prescribing between dentists and GPs were similar, and both had similar delays in referral, though one study found greater delays attributed to dentists as they had undertaken dental procedures. On average, patients had two to three consultations before referral. Less than 50% of studies described the primary care aspect of referral in detail. There was no information on inter-GP-dentist referrals.
Conclusion: There is a need for primary care studies on OSCC diagnosis. There was no evidence that GPs performed less well than dentists, which calls into question the NICE cancer option to refer to dentists, particularly in the absence of robust auditable pathways.
Keywords: dentists; diagnostic delay; general practitioners; oral cancer; professional delay; referral; squamous cell cancer.
© British Journal of General Practice 2019.
Figures
Similar articles
-
How do primary care doctors compare to dentists in the referral of oral cancer?Evid Based Dent. 2021 Jan;22(3):94-95. doi: 10.1038/s41432-021-0201-3. Evid Based Dent. 2021. PMID: 34561656
-
Comparison of primary care doctors and dentists in the referral of oral cancer: a systematic review.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;58(8):898-917. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 24. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32591210
-
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15520094
-
Delayed referral of patients with diabetic foot ulcers across Europe: patterns between primary care and specialised units.J Wound Care. 2018 Mar 2;27(3):186-192. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.3.186. J Wound Care. 2018. PMID: 29509115
-
Is There A Difference Between Disease-Free Survival Of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Referred By Dentists Versus Other Physicians? A Systematic Review.J Pak Med Assoc. 2023 Oct;73(10):2036-2040. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.7308. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023. PMID: 37876066
Cited by
-
Identification of Novel MicroRNAs and Their Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance in Oral Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2019 Apr 30;11(5):610. doi: 10.3390/cancers11050610. Cancers (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31052345 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of conventional oral examination for detecting oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients with clinically evident oral lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Head Neck. 2022 Apr;44(4):998-1013. doi: 10.1002/hed.26992. Epub 2022 Jan 29. Head Neck. 2022. PMID: 35092324 Free PMC article.
-
Oral Cancer Screening by Artificial Intelligence-Oriented Interpretation of Optical Coherence Tomography Images.Radiol Res Pract. 2022 Apr 23;2022:1614838. doi: 10.1155/2022/1614838. eCollection 2022. Radiol Res Pract. 2022. PMID: 35502299 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Deep learning model for tongue cancer diagnosis using endoscopic images.Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 15;12(1):6281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10287-9. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35428854 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of general medical practitioners in developed countries regarding oral cancer: an integrative review.Fam Pract. 2020 Oct 19;37(5):592-605. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa026. Fam Pract. 2020. PMID: 32253436 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cancer Research UK Men twice as likely to develop oral cancer. 2017. Press release. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-us/cancer-news/press-release/2017... (accessed 10 Oct 2018)
-
- Office for National Statistics. Cancer registration statistics, England: 2016. ONS; 2018. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/... (accessed 10 Oct 2018)
-
- UK National Screening Committee The UK NSC recommendation on oral cancer screening in adults. UK NSC. 2016 https://legacyscreening.phe.org.uk/oralcancer (accessed 10 Oct 2018)
-
- Speight PM, Epstein J, Kujan O, et al. Screening for oral cancer — a perspective from the Global Oral Cancer Forum. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123:680–687. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical