Cardiorespiratory sleep studies at home: experience in research and clinical cohorts
- PMID: 30455364
- DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315676
Cardiorespiratory sleep studies at home: experience in research and clinical cohorts
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the success rates of home cardiorespiratory polygraphy in children under investigation for sleep-disordered breathing and parent perspectives on equipment use at home.
Design: Prospective observational study.
Setting: Sheffield, Evelina London and Southampton Children's Hospitals.
Patients: Data are reported for 194 research participants with Down syndrome, aged 0.5-5.9 years across the three centres and 61 clinical patients aged 0.4-19.5 years from one centre, all of whom had home cardiorespiratory polygraphy including respiratory movements, nasal pressure flow, pulse oximetry, body position and motion.
Main outcome measures: Percentage of home cardiorespiratory studies successfully acquiring ≥4 hours of artefact-free data at the first attempt. Parental report of ease of use of equipment and preparedness to repeat home diagnostics in the future.
Results: 143/194 (74%; 95% CI 67% to 79%) of research participants and 50/61 (82%; 95% CI 71% to 90%) of clinical patients had successful home cardiorespiratory polygraphy at the first attempt. Some children required multiple attempts to achieve a successful study. Overall, this equated to 1.3 studies per research participant and 1.2 studies per clinical child. The median artefact-free sleep time for successful research studies was 515 min (range 261-673) and for clinical studies 442 min (range 291-583). 84% of research and 87% of clinical parents expressed willingness to repeat home cardiorespiratory polygraphy in the future. 67% of research parents found the equipment 'easy or okay' to use, while 64% of clinical parents reported it as 'easy' or 'very easy'.
Conclusions: Home cardiorespiratory polygraphy offers an acceptable approach to the assessment of sleep-disordered breathing in children.
Keywords: cardiorespiratory polygraphy; home; obstructive sleep apnoea; screening; sleep-disordered breathing.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources