Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 14:4:37.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0090-6. eCollection 2018.

21-Gene assay as predictor of chemotherapy benefit in HER2-negative breast cancer

Affiliations

21-Gene assay as predictor of chemotherapy benefit in HER2-negative breast cancer

Charles E Geyer Jr et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. .

Abstract

The NSABP B-20 prospective-retrospective study of the 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Recurrence Score® test predicted benefit from addition of chemotherapy to tamoxifen in node-negative, estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer when recurrence score (RS) was ≥31. HER2 is a component of the RS algorithm with a positive coefficient and contributes to higher RS values. Accrual to B-20 occurred prior to routine testing for HER2, so questions have arisen regarding assay performance if HER2-positive patients were identified and excluded. We report an exploratory reanalysis of the B-20, 21-gene study following exclusion of such patients. Patients were considered HER2 positive if quantitative RT-PCR for HER2 was ≥11.5 units, and excluded from re-analyses performed using the original cutoffs: <18, 18-30, ≥31, and the TAILORx cutoffs: <11, 11-25, >25. The endpoint remained distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) as in the original study. Distribution was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method and compared via log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models estimated chemotherapy benefit in each group. In the RS < 18 and 18-30 groups, 1.7 and 6.7% were HER2 positive. In the RS ≥ 31 group, 41% were HER2 positive. Exclusion resulted in fewer events, with loss of significance for benefit from chemotherapy in the overall HER2-negative cohort (log-rank P = 0.06), but substantial benefit from chemotherapy remained in the RS ≥ 31 cohort (HR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07-0.47) and the RS > 25 cohort (HR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.12-0.64). No benefit from chemotherapy was evident in the other RS groups. Following exclusion of HER2-positive patients based on RT-PCR expression, substantial benefit of chemotherapy remained for RS ≥ 31 as originally employed, and with RS > 25 employed in TAILORx.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Mamounas: Genomic Health, Inc.: Consultant, Honoraria (Speaker); Biotheranostics: Consultant. Dr. Paik discloses being listed as one of the inventors of OncotypeDx in the patents, but all rights have been transferred to NSABP Foundation, resulting in no financial interest. Dr. Shak: Genomic Health, Inc.: Full-time employee and shareholder. Dr. Crager: Employment at Genomic Health, Inc., and ownership of company stock. Dr. Baehner: Employee and minor shareholder of Genomic Health, Inc. All other authors declare no other potential competing interest(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT Diagram for 21-gene assay study using available primary breast cancer specimens from NSABP B-20
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier estimates of the probability of remaining free of distant recurrence by original RS groups following exclusion of patients with presumed HER2-positive disease, comparing treatment with tamoxifen alone with tamoxifen plus chemotherapy. a All patients; b low-risk RS < 18; c intermediate-risk RS 18–30; and d high-risk RS ≥ 31
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier estimates of the probability of remaining free of distant recurrence by TAILORx RS groups following exclusion of patients with presumed HER2-positive disease comparing treatment with tamoxifen alone with tamoxifen plus chemotherapy. a RS < 11; b RS 11–25; c RS > 25

References

    1. Paik S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24:3726–3734. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7985. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF. Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1446–1452. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp335. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sparano JA, Paik S. Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:721–728. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albain KS, et al. Prognostic and 286 predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-287 positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis 288 of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:55–65. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70314-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paik S, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:2817–2826. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041588. - DOI - PubMed