Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;12(3):240-249.
doi: 10.1007/s12265-018-9845-6. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

Splanchnic Circulation and Intraabdominal Metabolism in Two Porcine Models of Low Cardiac Output

Affiliations

Splanchnic Circulation and Intraabdominal Metabolism in Two Porcine Models of Low Cardiac Output

Jenny Seilitz et al. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

The impact of acute cardiac dysfunction on the gastrointestinal tract was investigated in anesthetized and instrumented pigs by sequential reductions of cardiac output (CO). Using a cardiac tamponade (n = 6) or partial inferior caval vein balloon inflation (n = 6), CO was controllably reduced for 1 h each to 75% (CO75%), 50% (CO50%), and 35% (CO35%) of the baseline value. Cardiac output in controls (n = 6) was not manipulated and maintained. Mean arterial pressure, superior mesenteric arterial blood flow, and intestinal mucosal perfusion started to decrease at CO50% in the intervention groups. The decrease in superior mesenteric arterial blood flow was non-linear and exaggerated at CO35%. Systemic, venous mesenteric, and intraperitoneal lactate concentrations increased in the intervention groups from CO50%. Global and mesenteric oxygen uptake decreased at CO35%. In conclusion, gastrointestinal metabolism became increasingly anaerobic when CO was reduced by 50%. Anaerobic gastrointestinal metabolism in low CO can be detected using intraperitoneal microdialysis.

Keywords: Cardiac dysfunction; Cardiac tamponade; Caval vein balloon; Intraperitoneal microdialysis; Laser Doppler flowmetry; Porcine model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cardiac output (CO, panel a, data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges) and survival (panel b) in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs subjected to a graded reduction of CO to 75% (CO75%), 50% (CO50%), and 35% (CO35%) of the baseline value by either cardiac tamponade (n = 6) or partial inflation of an inferior caval vein balloon (n = 6). In one group, no intervention was made (control, n = 6)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean arterial pressure (MAP, panel a), heart rate (HR, panel b), central venous pressure (CVP, panel c), mesenteric venous pressure (MVP, panel d), superior mesenteric arterial blood flow (SMA, panel e), and intestinal mucosal perfusion (Muc. perf., panel f) in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs subjected to a graded reduction of cardiac output to 75% (CO75%), 50% (CO50%), and 35% (CO35%) of the baseline value by either cardiac tamponade (n = 6) or partial inflation of an inferior caval vein balloon (n = 6). In one group, no intervention was made (control, n = 6). Data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges. Asterisk, number, and currency symbols indicate a statistical difference (P < 0.05) between the caval vein balloon group and the control group, the cardiac tamponade group and the control group, and the caval vein balloon and cardiac tamponade groups, respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Curve estimations for the blood flow index in the superior mesenteric artery (SMAI) and the cardiac index (CI) in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs subjected to a graded reduction of cardiac output by cardiac tamponade or partial inflation of an inferior caval vein balloon and controls
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Global and mesenteric oxygen deliveries (DO2, panela a and b, respectively), mixed-venous saturation (Mix.-ven. SO2, panel c), mesenteric venous saturation (Mes. ven. SO2, panel d), global and mesenteric oxygen uptakes (VO2, panels e and f, respectively), and also systemic and mesenteric venous lactate concentrations (panels g and h, respectively) in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs subjected to a graded reduction of cardiac output to 75% (CO75%), 50% (CO50%), and 35% (CO35%) of the baseline value by either cardiac tamponade (n = 6) or partial inflation of an inferior caval vein balloon (n = 6). In one group, no intervention was made (control, n = 6). Data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges. Asterisk, number, and currency symbols indicate a statistical difference (P < 0.05) between the caval vein balloon group and the control group, the cardiac tamponade group and the control group, and the caval vein balloon and cardiac tamponade groups, respectively

Similar articles

References

    1. Lomivorotov VV, Efremov SM, Kirov MY, Fominskiy EV, Karaskov AM. Low-cardiac-output syndrome after cardiac surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2017;31(1):291–308. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mebazaa A, Pitsis AA, Rudiger A, Toller W, Longrois D, Ricksten SE, et al. Clinical review: practical recommendations on the management of perioperative heart failure in cardiac surgery. Critical Care (London, England) 2010;14(2):201. doi: 10.1186/cc8153. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hassoun HT, Kone BC, Mercer DW, Moody FG, Weisbrodt NW, Moore FA. Post-injury multiple organ failure: the role of the gut. Shock. 2001;15(1):1–10. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200115010-00001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaudhry R, Zaki J, Wegner R, Pednekar G, Tse A, Sheinbaum R, et al. Gastrointestinal complications after cardiac surgery: a nationwide population-based analysis of morbidity and mortality predictors. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2017;31(4):1268–1274. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.04.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez R, Robich MP, Plate JF, Trooskin SZ, Sellke FW. Gastrointestinal complications following cardiac surgery: a comprehensive review. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2010;25(2):188–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2009.00985.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types