Detection of Salmonella from animal sources in South Africa between 2007 and 2014
- PMID: 30456978
- PMCID: PMC6244140
- DOI: 10.4102/jsava.v89i0.1643
Detection of Salmonella from animal sources in South Africa between 2007 and 2014
Abstract
Retrospective laboratory-based surveillance was conducted on Salmonella serotypes isolated from various animal species from 2007 to 2014 at the Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort Veterinary Research Institute, South Africa. During the surveillance period, 1229 salmonellae isolations were recorded. Around 108 different serotypes were recovered from nine different food and non-food animal host species. The three most common serotypes were Salmonella entericasubspecies enterica serotype Heidelberg (n = 200), Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Enteritidis (n = 170) and Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Typhimurium (n = 146). These were followed by Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Anatum (n = 62) and Salmonella entericasubspecies enterica serotype Infantis (n = 57). Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Schwarzengrund and Salmonella enterica subspecies entericaserotype Muenchen were recovered in 50 and 48 cases, respectively. Of the total number of isolations recorded during the period under review, 871 (70.8%) occurred in poultry and other birds, 162 (13.2%) in horses, 116 (9.4%) in cattle, 26 (2.1%) in sheep and goats, 22 (1.8%) in rhinoceroses, 16 (1.3%) in pigs, 8 (0.6%) in crocodiles, 6 (0.5%) in cats and 6 (0.5%) in leopards. Food animals accounted for 83.5% of the total isolations, with cattle and poultry representing approximately 72.7%. Forty-two (3.4 %) isolates were found from non-food animals that include rhinoceroses (n = 22), crocodiles (n = 8), leopards (n = 6) and cats (n = 6). Salmonella Heidelberg was the most frequently isolated serotype, whereas S. Typhimurium had the widest zoological distribution. Clinical laboratory isolation of different Salmonella serotypes from various hosts may aid in recognising the threat to livestock, public and environmental health. Moreover, it may also highlight the potential zoonotic and food safety risk implications of the detected Salmonella serotypes.
Keywords: South Africa; animal; retrospctive; salmonella; surveillance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with regard to the writing of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Altekruse S.F., Bauer N., Chanlongbutra A., DeSagun R., Naugle A., Schlosser W. et al. , 2006, ‘Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler chickens, United States, 2000–2005’, Emerging Infectious Diseases 12(12), 1848–1852. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1212.060653 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Altekruse S., Koehler J., Hickman-Brenner F., Tauxe R.V. & Ferris K., 1993, ‘A comparison of Salmonella Enteritidis phage types from egg-associated outbreaks and implicated laying flocks’, Epidemiology and Infection 110, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800050639 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Amavisit P., Markham P.F., Lightfoot D., Whithear K.G. & Browning G.F., 2001, ‘Molecular epidemiology of Salmonella Heidelberg in an equine hospital’, Veterinary Microbiology 80, 85–98. - PubMed
-
- Anderson R.L., Walker R.L., Hird D.W. & Blanchard P.C., 1997, ‘Case-control study of an outbreak of clinical disease attributable to Salmonella infection in eight dairy herds’, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 210, 528–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00373-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bahnson P.B., Fedorka-Cray P.J., Ladely S.R. & Mateus-Pinilla N.E., 2006, ‘Herd-level risk factors for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica in U.S. market pigs’, Preventive Veterinary Medicine 76(3–4), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.05.009 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous