Impact of a custom-made 3D printed ergonomic grip for direct laryngoscopy on novice intubation performance in a simulated easy and difficult airway scenario-A manikin study
- PMID: 30458013
- PMCID: PMC6245686
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207445
Impact of a custom-made 3D printed ergonomic grip for direct laryngoscopy on novice intubation performance in a simulated easy and difficult airway scenario-A manikin study
Abstract
Direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh laryngoscope is the most widely used approach; however, this skill is not easy for novices and trainees. We evaluated the performance of novices using a laryngoscope with a three-dimensional (3D)-printed ergonomic grip on an airway manikin. Forty second-year medical students were enrolled. Endotracheal intubation was attempted using a conventional Macintosh laryngoscope with or without a 3D-printed ergonomic support grip. Primary outcomes were intubation time and overall success rate. Secondary outcomes were number of unsuccessful attempts, first-attempt success rate, airway Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, and difficulty score. In the easy airway scenario, intubation time, and the overall success rate were similar between two group. CL grade and ease-of-use scores were significantly better for those using the ergonomic support grip (P < 0.05). In the difficult airway scenario, intubation time (49.7±37.5 vs. 35.5±29.2, P = 0.013), the first-attempt success rate (67.5% vs. 90%, P = 0.029), number of attempts (1.4±0.6 vs. 1.1±0.4, P = 0.006), CL grade (2 [2, 2] vs. 2 [1, 1], P = 0.012), and ease-of-use scores (3.5 [2, 4] vs. 4 [3, 5], P = 0.008) were significantly better for those using the ergonomic support grip. Linear mixed model analysis showed that the ergonomic support grip had a favorable effect on CL grade (P<0.001), ease-of-use scores (P<0.001), intubation time (P = 0.015), and number of intubation attempts (P = 0.029). Our custom 3D-printed ergonomic laryngoscope support grip improved several indicators related to the successful endotracheal intubation in the easy and difficult scenario simulated on an airway manikin. This grip may be useful for intubation training and practice.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparison of AirAngel® vs. Storz® videolaryngoscope and Macintosh® laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation training: prospective randomized crossover study.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 27;24(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05388-0. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39192254 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq(®) NT, McGrath(®) MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin.Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016 May-Jun;66(3):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.10.009. Epub 2015 May 12. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016. PMID: 27108827 Clinical Trial.
-
Development and performance testing of the low-cost, 3D-printed, smartphone-compatible 'Tansen Videolaryngoscope' vs. Pentax-AWS videolaryngoscope vs. direct Macintosh laryngoscope: A manikin study.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Nov;37(11):992-998. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001264. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020. PMID: 32675700
-
ETView VivaSight single lumen vs. conventional intubation in simulated studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520925653. doi: 10.1177/0300060520925653. J Int Med Res. 2020. PMID: 32588689 Free PMC article.
-
Cricoid pressure during intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Heart Lung. 2020 Mar-Apr;49(2):175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Nov 2. Heart Lung. 2020. PMID: 31685271
Cited by
-
Advancements in additive manufacturing for video laryngoscopes: a comprehensive scoping and technological review.Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 14;12(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02406-y. Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 38098125 Free PMC article.
-
Novel co-axial, disposable, low-cost 3D printed videolaryngoscopes for patients with COVID-19: a manikin study.Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2022 Dec 19;2(1):e0015. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000015. eCollection 2023 Feb. Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2022. PMID: 39916760 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-specific and hyper-realistic phantom for an intubation simulator with a replaceable difficult airway of a toddler using 3D printing.Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 30;10(1):10631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67575-5. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32606342 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing Cricothyroidotomy Training for Novices Using Three-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Models of a Patient with Obesity.J Med Syst. 2025 Jun 3;49(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02209-9. J Med Syst. 2025. PMID: 40459663 Clinical Trial.
-
3D printing in critical care: a narrative review.3D Print Med. 2020 Sep 30;6(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41205-020-00081-6. 3D Print Med. 2020. PMID: 32997313 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Konrad C, Schupfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning Manual Skills in Anesthesiology: Is There a Recommended Number of Cases for Anesthetic Procedures? Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1998;86: 635–639. 10.1213/00000539-199803000-00037 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Maharaj CH, McDonnell JG, Harte BH, Laffey JG. A comparison of direct and indirect laryngoscopes and the ILMA in novice users: a manikin study. Anaesthesia. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 2007;62: 1161–1166. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05216.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh Blade versus GlideScopeSuccess Rate and Time for Endotracheal Intubation in Untrained Medical Personnel. Anesthes. The American Society of Anesthesiologists; 2009;110: 32–37. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190b6a7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Miki T, Inagawa G, Kikuchi T, Koyama Y, Goto T. Evaluation of the Airway Scope, a new video laryngoscope, in tracheal intubation by naive operators: a manikin study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 2007;51: 1378–1381. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01450.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Frova G, Sorbello M. Algorithms for difficult airway management: a review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009;75: 201–209. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical