Systematic reviews for policy-making - critical reflections are needed
- PMID: 30458786
- PMCID: PMC6245825
- DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0387-9
Systematic reviews for policy-making - critical reflections are needed
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Comment on
-
Evidence-based medicine - an appropriate tool for evidence-based health policy? A case study from Norway.Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Mar 5;14:15. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0088-1. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016. PMID: 26945751 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. http://handbook.cochrane.org/. Accessed 6 Nov 2018.
-
- Segal JZ. Health and the Rhetoric of Medicine. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008.
-
- Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–926. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
