Context matters
- PMID: 30459523
- PMCID: PMC6223722
- DOI: 10.1007/s10683-017-9546-z
Context matters
Abstract
Eliciting the level of risk aversion of experimental subjects is of crucial concern to experimenters. In the literature there are a variety of methods used for such elicitation; the concern of the experiment reported in this paper is to compare them. The methods we investigate are the following: Holt-Laury price lists; pairwise choices, the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak method; allocation questions. Clearly their relative efficiency in measuring risk aversion depends upon the numbers of questions asked; but the method itself may well influence the estimated risk-aversion. While it is impossible to determine a 'best' method (as the truth is unknown) we can look at the differences between the different methods. We carried out an experiment in four parts, corresponding to the four different methods, with 96 subjects. In analysing the data our methodology involves fitting preference functionals; we use four, Expected Utility and Rank-Dependent Expected Utility, each combined with either a CRRA or a CARA utility function. Our results show that the inferred level of risk aversion is more sensitive to the elicitation method than to the assumed-true preference functional. Experimenters should worry most about context.
Keywords: Decision making; Experimental design; Experimental methods; Preference measures; Risk taking.
Figures
References
-
- Andreoni J, Miller J. Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica. 2002;70(2):737–753. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00302. - DOI
-
- Bardsley N, Cubitt R, Loomes G, Moffatt P, Starmer C, Sugden R. Experimental economics: Rethinking the rules. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2010.
-
- Bateman, I., Day, B., Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (2006). Ranking versus choice in the elicitation of preferences. Working Paper, University of East Anglia.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources