Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018;21(4):723-756.
doi: 10.1007/s10683-017-9546-z. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

Context matters

Affiliations

Context matters

Wenting Zhou et al. Exp Econ. 2018.

Abstract

Eliciting the level of risk aversion of experimental subjects is of crucial concern to experimenters. In the literature there are a variety of methods used for such elicitation; the concern of the experiment reported in this paper is to compare them. The methods we investigate are the following: Holt-Laury price lists; pairwise choices, the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak method; allocation questions. Clearly their relative efficiency in measuring risk aversion depends upon the numbers of questions asked; but the method itself may well influence the estimated risk-aversion. While it is impossible to determine a 'best' method (as the truth is unknown) we can look at the differences between the different methods. We carried out an experiment in four parts, corresponding to the four different methods, with 96 subjects. In analysing the data our methodology involves fitting preference functionals; we use four, Expected Utility and Rank-Dependent Expected Utility, each combined with either a CRRA or a CARA utility function. Our results show that the inferred level of risk aversion is more sensitive to the elicitation method than to the assumed-true preference functional. Experimenters should worry most about context.

Keywords: Decision making; Experimental design; Experimental methods; Preference measures; Risk taking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representation of a lottery
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a A price list; b a completed price list
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a A price list; b a completed price list
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A pairwise choice
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a The lottery (in the Becker-Degroot-Marschak mechanism); b the uniform distribution (over the range of the lottery); c a lottery choice
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
An allocation
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Estimates of r using AL across preference functionals. Each scatter plots the r value elicited using the AL method across the different preference functionals
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Estimates of r in RRRD across elicitation methods. Each scatter plots the r value elicited using the RRRD specification across the different elicitation methods
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Estimates of r in AREU across elicitation methods. Each scatter plots the r value elicited using the AREU specification across the different elicitation methods
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Estimates of s in RRRD across elicitation methods. Each scatter plots the s value elicited using the RRRD specification across the different elicitation methods

References

    1. Andreoni J, Miller J. Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica. 2002;70(2):737–753. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00302. - DOI
    1. Bardsley N, Cubitt R, Loomes G, Moffatt P, Starmer C, Sugden R. Experimental economics: Rethinking the rules. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2010.
    1. Bateman, I., Day, B., Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (2006). Ranking versus choice in the elicitation of preferences. Working Paper, University of East Anglia.
    1. Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H, Anderson SW. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition. 1994;50(1):7–15. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becker GM, DeGroot MH, Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science. 1964;9(3):226–232. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830090304. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources