Intracoronary or intravenous abciximab after aspiration thrombectomy in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract

Objective: To test whether aspiration thrombectomy with intracoronary (IC) instead of intravenous (IV) administration of abciximab could reduce the no-reflow phenomenon in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Background: Despite recanalisation with PCI, failure to restore microvascular flow may affect the prognosis of patients with STEMI. A combination of aspiration thrombectomy with IC abciximab may improve distal perfusion.

Methods: After aspiration thrombectomy during primary PCI for STEMI, 160 patients were randomly assigned to either an IV or IC abciximab bolus delivered through the aspiration catheter, both followed by a 12-hour IV abciximab infusion.

Results: ST-segment resolution ≥ 70% was achieved in 36 of 78 patients with IC versus 30 of 82 patients with IV abciximab (46.1 vs 36.6%, p = 0.368), and partial resolution in 28 of 78 versus 31 of 82 patients (35.9 vs 37.8%, p = 0.368). Postprocedural myocardial blush grade (MBG) 3 was obtained in 62.8 vs 63.4% (p = 0.235) and MBG ≥ 2 in 89.7 vs 81.7% (p = 0.148) of patients given IC and IV abciximab, respectively. There were three deaths in each group (3.8%). Major adverse cardiac events occurred in six of 78 patients given the IC and seven of 82 patients given the IV abciximab bolus (7.6 vs 8.5%, p = 0.410). One stroke occurred in each group, and two patients in the IC and nine in the IV group developed renal failure (2.5 vs 10.9%, p = 0.414).

Conclusions: IC versus IV abciximab did not enhance myocardial reperfusion in non-selected patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI after aspiration thrombectomy had successfully been performed.

Keywords: abciximab; aspiration thrombectomy; myocardial infarction; primary percutaneous intervention.