Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):2589.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112589.

Geographical Prevalence of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome as Determined by Region and Race/Ethnicity

Affiliations
Review

Geographical Prevalence of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome as Determined by Region and Race/Ethnicity

Wendy M Wolf et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is thought to be the most common endocrine disorder found in women. Common symptoms include irregular menstrual cycle, polycystic ovaries, and hirsutism, as well as an increased risk for a multitude of conditions, including insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and infertility. The prevalence of polycystic ovarian syndrome is generally thought to be between 3% and 10% but it is widely unknown for specific subpopulations based on geographical location and race/ethnicity. Based on the high degree of variability and inconsistencies between the different diagnostic criteria, there is a unique challenge that exists when determining the prevalence of this syndrome. There are a large percentage of individuals that remain undiagnosed even after visiting multiple health care providers. Most studies conducted across the world are limited by small sample size, selection bias, and lack of comparability across studies. There have been very few studies that have examined the prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome across the United States. Based on the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s diagnostic criteria, there is a similar prevalence of PCOS documented across the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, Greece, Australia, and Mexico. Other studies have shown some differences between geographical location and race. The existing data is not conclusive enough to determine whether or not there is any significant differences in the prevalence of PCOS across geographical location, racial or ethnic groups. This review will seek to determine the prevalence of polycystic ovarian syndrome based on geographical location and race/ethnicity.

Keywords: diagnostic criteria; ethnicity; polycystic ovary syndrome; prevalence; race; regions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Okoroh E.M., Hooper W.C., Atrash H.K., Yusuf H.R., Boulet S.L. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome among the privately insured, United States, 2003–2008. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012;207:299.e1–299.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. March W.A., Moore V.M., Willson K.J., Phillips D.I., Norman R.J., Davies M.J. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria. Hum. Reprod. 2010;25:544–551. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep399. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azziz R., Woods K.S., Reyna R., Key T.J., Knochenhauer E.S., Yildiz B.O. The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syndrome in an unselected population. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004;89:2745–2749. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-032046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knochenhauer E.S., Key T.J., Kahsar-Miller M., Waggoner W., Boots L.R., Azziz R. Prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected black and white women of the southeastern United States: A prospective study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998;83:3078–3082. doi: 10.1210/jc.83.9.3078. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kauffman R.P., Baker V.M., Dimarino P., Gimpel T., Castracane V.D. Polycystic ovarian syndrome and insulin resistance in white and Mexican American women: A comparison of two distinct populations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002;187:1362–1369. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.126650. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types