Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct-Dec;16(4):1474704918812124.
doi: 10.1177/1474704918812124.

Mating Effort Predicts Human Menstrual Cycle Frequency

Affiliations

Mating Effort Predicts Human Menstrual Cycle Frequency

Jeffrey Gassen et al. Evol Psychol. 2018 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

The human menstrual cycle is characterized by substantial variability both within and between women. Here, we sought to account for such variability by examining whether human menstrual cycle frequency varies as a function of the projected fitness payoffs associated with investment in mating effort. We used structural equation modeling to test the prediction that women whose environmental conditions or life histories favor heavier investment in mating effort would have shorter, more regular cycles. Results supported our hypothesis, revealing that women who project more mating success and have faster life history strategies exhibit greater mating effort and shorter, more regular menstrual cycles. An alternative model that specified cycle frequency as a predictor of mating effort was a poor fit for the data, lending support for the hypothesized directionality of the path between these variables. Together, these results provide some of the first empirical evidence that the length and regularity of the human menstrual cycle may be calibrated to investment in mating effort.

Keywords: fecundity; life history theory; mating effort; mating success; menstrual cycle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Final model with standardized estimates. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Alternative model with standardized estimates. Nonsignificant paths denoted by dotted lines. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arslan R. C., Schilling K. M., Gerlach T. M., Penke L. (2018). Using 26,000 diary entries to show ovulatory changes in sexual desire and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. - PubMed
    1. Barron M. L., Flick L. H., Cook C. A., Homan S. M., Campbell C. (2008). Associations between psychiatric disorders and menstrual cycle characteristics. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 22, 254–265. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2007.11.001 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bateman A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368. - PubMed
    1. Belsky J., Schlomer G. L., Ellis B. J. (2012). Beyond cumulative risk: Distinguishing harshness and unpredictability as determinants of parenting and early life history strategy. Developmental Psychology, 48, 662–673. doi:10.1037/a0024454 - PubMed
    1. Belsky J., Steinberg L., Draper P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources