The importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization
- PMID: 30464666
- PMCID: PMC6219423
- DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S156279
The importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can be included in clinical trials as primary or secondary endpoints and are increasingly recognized by regulators, clinicians, and patients as valuable tools to collect patient-centered data. PROs provide unique information on the impact of a medical condition and its treatment from the patient's perspective; therefore, PROs can be included in clinical trials to ensure the impact of a trial intervention is comprehensively assessed. This review first discusses examples of how PRO endpoints have added value to clinical trial interpretation. Second, it describes the problems with current practices in designing, implementing, and reporting PRO studies, and how these problems may be addressed by complying with guidance for protocol development, selecting appropriate PRO measures to match clinically motivated PRO hypotheses, minimizing the rates of avoidable missing PRO data, analyzing and interpreting PRO data, and transparently reporting PRO findings.
Keywords: clinical trials as topic; patient-reported outcomes; quality of life; research practices; trial conduct.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Unrelated to the current work: Professor Calvert has received personal fees from Astellas Pharmaand Ferring and chairs the ISOQOL Best Practice for PROs in Trials Taskforce and Standards and Best Practice Committee.Professor Stockler’s institution has received research funding from Astellas Pharma, Celgene, Bayer, Bionomics, Medivation, Sanofi,Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, Merck Sharp& Dohme (MSD), and Tilray and has received travel support from Medivation/Pfizer.Professor Friedlander has received honoraria for advisory boards for Astra Zeneca and MSD. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
References
-
- Guidance for Industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labelling claims Food and Drug Administration. 2009. [Accessed January 10, 2015]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformat....
-
- Revicki DA, Osoba D, Fairclough D, et al. Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(8):887–900. - PubMed
-
- Au HJ, Ringash J, Brundage M, et al. Added value of health-related quality of life measurement in cancer clinical trials: the experience of the NCIC CTG. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(2):119–128. - PubMed
-
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Strengthening the international comparison of health system performance through patient-reported indicators. Recommendations to OECD Ministers of Health from the High Level Reflection Group on the Future of Health Statistics. 2017. [Accessed May 07, 2017]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Recommendations-from-high-level-....
-
- Scoggins JF, Patrick DL. The use of patient-reported outcomes instruments in registered clinical trials: evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(4):289–292. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous