Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;25(5):338-341.
doi: 10.3747/co.25.4230. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

Discrepancies between Canadian cancer research funding and site-specific cancer burden: a spotlight on ten disease sites

Affiliations

Discrepancies between Canadian cancer research funding and site-specific cancer burden: a spotlight on ten disease sites

A C Coronado et al. Curr Oncol. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Cancer research is essential in evaluating the safety and effectiveness of emerging cancer treatments, which in turn can lead to ground-breaking advancements in cancer care. Given limited research funding, allocating resources in alignment with societal burden is essential. However, evidence shows that such alignment does not typically occur. The objective of the present study was to provide an updated overview of site-specific cancer research investment in Canada and to explore potential discrepancies between the site-specific burden and the level of research investment.

Methods: The 10 cancer sites with the highest mortality in 2015-which included brain, female breast, colorectal, leukemia, lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ovary, pancreas, prostate, and uterus-were selected for the analysis. Information about site-specific research investment and cancer burden (raw incidence and mortality) was obtained from the Canadian Cancer Research Survey and Statistics Canada's cansim (the Canadian Socio-Economic Information Management System) respectively. The ratio of site-specific research investment to site-specific burden was used as an indicator of overfunding (ratio > 1) or underfunding (ratio < 1).

Results: The 3 cancer sites with the highest research investments were leukemia, prostate, and breast, which together represented 51.3% of 2015 cancer research funding. Conversely, the 3 cancer sites with the lowest investments were uterus, pancreas, and ovary, which together represented 7.8% of 2015 research funding. Relative to site-specific cancer burden, the lung, uterus, and colorectal sites were consistently the most underfunded.

Conclusions: Observed discrepancies between cancer burden and research investment indicate that some cancer sites (such as lung, colorectal, and uterus) seem to be underfunded when site-specific incidence and mortality are taken into consideration.

Keywords: Research investment; incidence; mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES We have read and understood Current Oncology’s policy on disclosing conflicts of interest, and we declare that we have none.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Site-specific cancer incidence, mortality, and research investment, 2015.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cancer research funding relative to site-specific burden. The numerator is the site-specific research funding expressed as a percentage of total 2015 funding, divided by (A) the site-specific incidence (percentage relative to overall cancer incidence) and (B) the site-specific mortality (percentage relative to overall cancer mortality). A ratio less than 1 is indicative of underfunding.

References

    1. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (cpac) The 2016 Cancer System Performance Report. Toronto, ON: CPAC; 2016.
    1. Carter AJ, Nguyen CN. A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:526. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-526. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carter AJR, Delarosa B, Hur H. An analysis of discrepancies between United Kingdom cancer research funding and societal burden and a comparison to previous and United States values. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:62. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0050-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Branton PE. Does Canadian research investment relate to cancer burden? Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:82–3. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70007-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patafio FM, Brooks SC, Wei X, Peng Y, Biagi J, Booth CM. Research output and the public health burden of cancer: is there any relationship? Curr Oncol. 2016;23:75–80. doi: 10.3747/co.23.2935. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources