Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 1;2(1):igy003.
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igy003. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Mediators of the Effect of Childhood Socioeconomic Status on Late Midlife Cognitive Abilities: A Four Decade Longitudinal Study

Affiliations

Mediators of the Effect of Childhood Socioeconomic Status on Late Midlife Cognitive Abilities: A Four Decade Longitudinal Study

Asad Beck et al. Innov Aging. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Childhood socioeconomic status (cSES) is found to predict later-life cognitive abilities, yet the mechanisms underlying these associations remain unclear. The objective of this longitudinal study was to examine the direct and indirect paths through which cSES influences late midlife cognitive outcomes.

Research design and methods: Participants were 1,009 male twins in the Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging (VETSA). At mean ages 20 and 62, participants completed a standardized test for general cognitive ability (GCA). The age 62 cognitive assessment also included in-person tests of processing speed, episodic memory, abstract reasoning, working memory, verbal fluency, visual-spatial ability, and executive functions. At mean age 56, participants were interviewed regarding their own and their parents' education and occupation, and completed questionnaires about cognitive leisure activities and sociodemographic information. Multiple mediation analyses were conducted to examine the direct path effects and indirect path effects of cSES through age 20 GCA, adult SES, and cognitive leisure activities on seven cognitive outcomes at age 62, adjusting for age, ethnicity, and non-independence of observations.

Results: Total (direct plus indirect) effects were significant for all measures with the exception of executive functions. Men from lower cSES backgrounds had poorer cognitive functioning in late midlife. The direct effect of cSES was partially mediated for abstract reasoning, and was fully mediated for the remaining six cognitive outcomes. Total indirect effects accounted for at least half of the total effects in each model, with paths through age 20 GCA explaining most of the total indirect effects.

Discussion and implications: cSES predicted cognitive functioning in late middle age Using multiple mediation models, we show that lower cSES predicts poorer cognition in late midlife primarily through young adult cognitive ability and to a lesser extent through SES in adulthood and engagement in cognitively stimulating activities.

Keywords: Adult development; Cognition; Cognitive leisure activities; Socioeconomic status; Veterans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Illustration of direct and indirect effect paths in each multiple mediation model; variables arranged temporally. The direct effect path leads from childhood SES (socioeconomic status) to cognitive ability, and the seven indirect effect paths lead: (a) through GCA (general cognitive ability); (b) through adult SES; (c) through CLA (cognitive leisure activities); (d) through GCA and adult SES; (e) through GCA and CLA; (f) through adult SES and CLA; and (g) through GCA, adult SES, and CLA. Cognitive abilities tested include GCA and the six specific cognitive ability measures (abstract reasoning, episodic memory, processing speed, verbal fluency, working memory, and visual-spatial ability).

References

    1. Baron R. M. & Kenny D. A (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 - PubMed
    1. Barulli D. & Stern Y (2013). Efficiency, capacity, compensation, maintenance, plasticity: Emerging concepts in cognitive reserve. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 502–509. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.012 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradley R. H. & Corwyn R. F (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233 - PubMed
    1. Briley D. A. & Tucker-Drob E. M (2013). Explaining the increasing heritability of cognitive ability across development: A meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies. Psychological Science, 24, 1704–1713. doi:10.1177/0956797613478618 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boehmer T. K., Flanders W. D., McGeehin M. A., Boyle C. A., & Barrett D. H (2004). Postservice mortality among Vietnam veterans: 30-year follow-up. Archives of Internal Medicine, 164, 1908–1916. doi:10.1001/archinte.164.17.1908 - PubMed