Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 22;6(1):207.
doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0593-2.

Gut microbiome composition is associated with spatial structuring and social interactions in semi-feral Welsh Mountain ponies

Affiliations

Gut microbiome composition is associated with spatial structuring and social interactions in semi-feral Welsh Mountain ponies

Rachael E Antwis et al. Microbiome. .

Abstract

Background: Microbiome composition is linked to host functional traits including metabolism and immune function. Drivers of microbiome composition are increasingly well-characterised; however, evidence of group-level microbiome convergence is limited and may represent a multi-level trait (i.e. across individuals and groups), whereby heritable phenotypes are influenced by social interactions. Here, we investigate the influence of spatial structuring and social interactions on the gut microbiome composition of Welsh mountain ponies.

Results: We show that semi-feral ponies exhibit variation in microbiome composition according to band (group) membership, in addition to considerable within-individual variation. Spatial structuring was also identified within bands, suggesting that despite communal living, social behaviours still influence microbiome composition. Indeed, we show that specific interactions (i.e. mother-offspring and stallion-mare) lead to more similar microbiomes, further supporting the notion that individuals influence the microbiome composition of one another and ultimately the group. Foals exhibited different microbiome composition to sub-adults and adults, most likely related to differences in diet.

Conclusions: We provide novel evidence that microbiome composition is structured at multiple levels within populations of social mammals and thus may form a unit on which selection can act. High levels of within-individual variation in microbiome composition, combined with the potential for social interactions to influence microbiome composition, suggest the direction of microbiome selection may be influenced by the individual members present in the group. Although the functional implications of this require further research, these results lend support to the idea that multi-level selection can act on microbiomes.

Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; Amplicon sequencing; Harem; Horizontal transmission; Life stage; Multi-level trait; Social networks; Spatial proximity; Vertical transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the University of Salford Research, Innovation, and Academic Engagement Ethical Approval Panel (ST1617-83) and the University of Manchester (Cat-D; non-licenced procedure).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
NMDS plot of the total microbiome of individual ponies in the study. Larger filled circles indicate the centroid for each individual
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Average (± SE) Jensen-Shannon divergence metrics for pony microbiome composition a within and between individuals; b within and between bands; c between mothers and their offspring, as well as between juveniles and non-maternal mares and foal-less mares; and d between the band stallion and band mares, and between all mares within a band. Significantly different results are indicated by *
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
NMDS plots of the total microbiome of ponies plotted according to band membership (a) and life stage (b). Larger filled circles indicate group centroids
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Map showing the spatial distribution of pony bands encountered during sampling. b Social network of the sampled individuals with edge width proportional to tie strength between individuals and c network visualisation of microbiome distance between individuals

References

    1. Bordenstein SR, Theis KR. Host biology in light of the microbiome: ten principles of holobionts and hologenomes. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:1–23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002226. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Douglas AEW. Holes in the hologenome: why host-microbe symbioses are not holobionts. MBio. 2016;7:1–7. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02099-15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg E, Zilber-Rosenberg I. The hologenome concept of evolution after 10 years. Microbiome. 2018;6:78. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0457-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blekhman R, Goodrich JK, Huang K, Sun Q, Bukowski R, Bell JT, et al. Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites. Genome Biol. 2015;16:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0759-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shapira M. Gut microbiotas and host evolution: scaling up symbiosis. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016;31:539–549. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources