Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 21;8(11):e023137.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023137.

Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres

Collaborators, Affiliations

Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres

Hannah R Maybrier et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Delirium is a common, serious postoperative complication. For clinical studies to generate valid findings, delirium assessments must be standardised and administered accurately by independent researchers. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a widely used delirium assessment tool. The objective was to determine whether implementing a standardised CAM training protocol for researchers at multiple international sites yields reliable inter-rater assessment and accurate delirium diagnosis.

Methods: Patients consented to video recordings of CAM delirium assessments for research purposes. Raters underwent structured training in CAM administration. Training entailed didactic education, role-playing with intensive feedback, apprenticeship with experienced researchers and group discussions of complex cases. Raters independently viewed and scored nine video-recorded CAM interviews. Inter-rater reliability was determined using Fleiss kappa. Accuracy was judged by comparing raters' scores with those of an expert delirium researcher.

Results: Twenty-seven raters from eight international research centres completed the study and achieved almost perfect agreement for overall delirium diagnosis, kappa=0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.92). Agreement of the four core CAM features ranged from fair to substantial. The sensitivity and specificity for identifying delirium were 72% (95% CI 60% to 81%) and 99% (95% CI 96% to 100%), considering an expert rater's scores as the reference standard (delirious, n=3; non-delirious, n=6). Delirium severity ratings were tightly clustered, with most scores within 5% of the median.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that, with appropriate training and ongoing scoring discussions, researchers at multiple sites can reliably detect delirium in postsurgical patients. These results support the premise that methodologically rigorous multi-centre studies can yield standardised and accurate determinations of delirium.

Keywords: adult anaesthesia; anesthesia; confusion; delirium; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)-S severity scores for each video-recorded interview.

References

    1. United States Census Bureau. The older population: 2010, 2011.
    1. Whitlock EL, Vannucci A, Avidan MS, et al. . Minerva anestesiologica 2011;77:448–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kennedy M, Enander RA, Tadiri SP, et al. . Delirium risk prediction, healthcare use and mortality of elderly adults in the Emergency Department. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014;62:462–9. 10.1111/jgs.12692 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De J, Wand AP. Delirium screening: a systematic review of delirium screening tools in hospitalized patients. Gerontologist 2015;55:1079–99. 10.1093/geront/gnv100 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Kosar CM, Tommet D, et al. . The CAM-S: development and validation of a new scoring system for delirium severity in 2 cohorts. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:526–33. 10.7326/M13-1927 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types