Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;49(1):69-80.
doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0097. Epub 2018 Aug 24.

Safety and Efficacy of Biodegradable Polymer-biolimus-eluting Stents (BP-BES) Compared with Durable Polymer-everolimus-eluting Stents (DP-EES) in Patients Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Affiliations

Safety and Efficacy of Biodegradable Polymer-biolimus-eluting Stents (BP-BES) Compared with Durable Polymer-everolimus-eluting Stents (DP-EES) in Patients Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Pil Sang Song et al. Korean Circ J. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background and objectives: There are no data comparing clinical outcomes of complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between biodegradable polymer-biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) and durable polymer-everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES). We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BP-BES compared with DP-EES in patients undergoing complex PCI.

Methods: Patients enrolled in the SMART-DESK registry were stratified into 2 categories based on the complexity of PCI. Complex PCI was defined as having at least one of the following features: unprotected left main lesion, ≥2 lesions treated, total stent length >40 mm, minimal stent diameter ≤2.5 mm, or bifurcation as target lesion. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 2 years of follow-up.

Results: Of 1,999 patients, 1,145 (57.3%) underwent complex PCI: 521 patients were treated with BP-BES and 624 with DP-EES. In propensity-score matching analysis (481 pairs), the risks of TLF (3.8% vs. 5.2%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.578; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.246-1.359; p=0.209), cardiac death (2.5% vs. 2.5%, adjusted HR, 0.787; 95% CI, 0.244-2.539; p=0.689), TV-MI (0.5% vs. 0.4%, adjusted HR, 1.128; 95% CI, 0.157-8.093; p=0.905), and TLR (1.1% vs. 2.9%, adjusted HR, 0.390; 95% CI, 0.139-1.095; p=0.074) did not differ between 2 stent groups after complex PCI.

Conclusions: Clinical outcomes of BP-BES were comparable to those of DP-EES at 2 years after complex PCI. Our data suggest that use of BP-BES is acceptable, even for complex PCI.

Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Drug-eluting stents; Percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study population.
BP-BES = biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents; DP-EES = durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves for clinical outcomes in the propensity score matched population. TLF: cardiac death, TV-MI, and TLR.
BP-BES = biodegradable polymer-biolimus-eluting stents; DP-EES = durable polymer-everolimus-eluting stents; FU = follow-up; TLF = target lesion failure; TLR = target lesion revascularization; TV-MI = target vessel-related myocardial infarction.
Figure 3
Figure 3. HRs for target lesion failure according to various subgroups in complex PCI. TLF: cardiac death, TV-MI, and TLR. Complexity was defined as left main PCI, bifurcation PCI, ≥2 lesions treated, total stent length >40 mm, or minimal stent diameter ≤2.5 mm.
ACS = acute coronary syndrome; BP-BES = biodegradable polymer-biolimus-eluting stents; CI = confidence interval; DM = diabetes mellitus; DP-EES = durable polymer-everolimus-eluting stents; HR = hazard ratio; HTN = hypertension; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; TLF = target lesion failure; TLR = target lesion revascularization; TV-MI = target vessel-related myocardial infarction.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier curves for clinical outcomes of complex PCI in a landmark analysis between 6 months and 2 years. TLF: cardiac death, TV-MI, and TLR.
BP-BES = biodegradable polymer-biolimus-eluting stents; CI = confidence interval; DP-EES = durable polymer-everolimus-eluting stents; FU = follow-up; HR = hazard ratio, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; TLF = target lesion failure; TLR = target lesion revascularization; TV-MI = target vessel-related myocardial infarction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Park DW, Park SW. Stent thrombosis in the era of the drug-eluting stent. Korean Circ J. 2005;35:791–794.
    1. Minha S, Barbash IM, Dvir D, et al. Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents compared to first-generation drug-eluting stents in patients treated for multivessel disease. J Interv Cardiol. 2013;26:561–569. - PubMed
    1. Grundeken MJ, Wykrzykowska JJ, Ishibashi Y, et al. First generation versus second generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcations: 5-year follow-up of the LEADERS all-comers randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:E248–60. - PubMed
    1. Vlachojannis GJ, Smits PC, Hofma SH, et al. Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report from the COMPARE II trial (abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1215–1221. - PubMed
    1. Im E, Kim GS, Shin DH, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of a biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stent. J Interv Cardiol. 2016;29:162–167. - PubMed