Safety and Efficacy of Biodegradable Polymer-biolimus-eluting Stents (BP-BES) Compared with Durable Polymer-everolimus-eluting Stents (DP-EES) in Patients Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- PMID: 30468035
- PMCID: PMC6331317
- DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0097
Safety and Efficacy of Biodegradable Polymer-biolimus-eluting Stents (BP-BES) Compared with Durable Polymer-everolimus-eluting Stents (DP-EES) in Patients Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Abstract
Background and objectives: There are no data comparing clinical outcomes of complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between biodegradable polymer-biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) and durable polymer-everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES). We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BP-BES compared with DP-EES in patients undergoing complex PCI.
Methods: Patients enrolled in the SMART-DESK registry were stratified into 2 categories based on the complexity of PCI. Complex PCI was defined as having at least one of the following features: unprotected left main lesion, ≥2 lesions treated, total stent length >40 mm, minimal stent diameter ≤2.5 mm, or bifurcation as target lesion. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 2 years of follow-up.
Results: Of 1,999 patients, 1,145 (57.3%) underwent complex PCI: 521 patients were treated with BP-BES and 624 with DP-EES. In propensity-score matching analysis (481 pairs), the risks of TLF (3.8% vs. 5.2%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.578; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.246-1.359; p=0.209), cardiac death (2.5% vs. 2.5%, adjusted HR, 0.787; 95% CI, 0.244-2.539; p=0.689), TV-MI (0.5% vs. 0.4%, adjusted HR, 1.128; 95% CI, 0.157-8.093; p=0.905), and TLR (1.1% vs. 2.9%, adjusted HR, 0.390; 95% CI, 0.139-1.095; p=0.074) did not differ between 2 stent groups after complex PCI.
Conclusions: Clinical outcomes of BP-BES were comparable to those of DP-EES at 2 years after complex PCI. Our data suggest that use of BP-BES is acceptable, even for complex PCI.
Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Drug-eluting stents; Percutaneous coronary intervention.
Copyright © 2019. The Korean Society of Cardiology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Two-year clinical outcomes of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting durable-polymer-coated stents versus biolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer-coated stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction with dyslipidemia after percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the KAMIR.Heart Vessels. 2019 Feb;34(2):237-250. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1251-0. Epub 2018 Aug 30. Heart Vessels. 2019. PMID: 30167772
-
Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1215-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 May 31. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28579236 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting BioMatrix stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting Xience stents.PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0183079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183079. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28797113 Free PMC article.
-
Nobori biolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Circ J. 2014;78(8):1858-66. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-1558. Epub 2014 Jun 3. Circ J. 2014. PMID: 24899233 Review.
-
Biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents versus contemporary drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 31;13(1):1715. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26654-5. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36720978 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Clopidogrel monotherapy in patients with and without on-treatment high platelet reactivity: a SMART-CHOICE substudy.EuroIntervention. 2021 Dec 3;17(11):e888-e897. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00223. EuroIntervention. 2021. PMID: 34031020 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Durable-polymer versus biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndromes: three-year outcomes of the HOST REDUCE POLYTECH RCT Trial.EuroIntervention. 2024 Jun 17;20(12):e750-e759. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01053. EuroIntervention. 2024. PMID: 38887886 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Stent Selection in Complex Coronary Interventions: Thinking Complex?Korean Circ J. 2019 Jan;49(1):81-83. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0285. Epub 2018 Oct 19. Korean Circ J. 2019. PMID: 30468036 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Complex vs. non-complex percutaneous coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials.Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):795-805. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-01994-4. Epub 2022 Feb 25. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35212802
-
Durable polymer versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention: a post hoc analysis of the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS trial.EuroIntervention. 2022 Dec 2;18(11):e910-e919. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00372. EuroIntervention. 2022. PMID: 36000257 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Park DW, Park SW. Stent thrombosis in the era of the drug-eluting stent. Korean Circ J. 2005;35:791–794.
-
- Minha S, Barbash IM, Dvir D, et al. Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents compared to first-generation drug-eluting stents in patients treated for multivessel disease. J Interv Cardiol. 2013;26:561–569. - PubMed
-
- Grundeken MJ, Wykrzykowska JJ, Ishibashi Y, et al. First generation versus second generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcations: 5-year follow-up of the LEADERS all-comers randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:E248–60. - PubMed
-
- Vlachojannis GJ, Smits PC, Hofma SH, et al. Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report from the COMPARE II trial (abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1215–1221. - PubMed
-
- Im E, Kim GS, Shin DH, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of a biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stent. J Interv Cardiol. 2016;29:162–167. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous