Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 21;8(11):960.
doi: 10.3390/nano8110960.

Scaffold Structural Microenvironmental Cues to Guide Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tissue Applications

Affiliations
Review

Scaffold Structural Microenvironmental Cues to Guide Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tissue Applications

Xuening Chen et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

In the process of bone regeneration, new bone formation is largely affected by physico-chemical cues in the surrounding microenvironment. Tissue cells reside in a complex scaffold physiological microenvironment. The scaffold should provide certain circumstance full of structural cues to enhance multipotent mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation, osteoblast growth, extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and subsequent new bone formation. This article reviewed advances in fabrication technology that enable the creation of biomaterials with well-defined pore structure and surface topography, which can be sensed by host tissue cells (esp., stem cells) and subsequently determine cell fates during differentiation. Three important cues, including scaffold pore structure (i.e., porosity and pore size), grain size, and surface topography were studied. These findings improve our understanding of how the mechanism scaffold microenvironmental cues guide bone tissue regeneration.

Keywords: bone tissue regeneration; grain size; porosity; structural microenvironmental cues; surface topography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The hierarchical anatomy structures of bone tissues. Bone regeneration strategy is conducted by the synergistic effect of cells and scaffolds.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The biofunctions of scaffold structural microenvironmental cues.

References

    1. Dvir T., Timko B., Kohane D., Langer R. Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011;6:13–22. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.246. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Athanasiou K., Zhu C., Lanctot D., Agrawal C., Wang X. Fundamentals of biomechanics in tissue engineering of bone. Tissue Eng. 2000;6:361–381. doi: 10.1089/107632700418083. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McMahon R.E., Wang L., Skoracki R., Mathur A.B. Development of nanomaterials for bone repair and regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2013;101:387–397. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32823. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sadat-Shojai M., Khorasani M.-T., Dinpanah-Khoshdargi E., Jamshidi A. Synthesis methods for nanosized hydroxyapatite indiverse structures. Acta Biommater. 2013;9:7591–7621. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heo D.N., Castro N.J., Lee S.-J., Noh H., Zhu W., Zhang L.G. Enhanced bone tissue regeneration using a 3D printed microstructure incorporated with a hybrid nano hydrogel. Nanoscale. 2017;9:5055–5062. doi: 10.1039/C6NR09652B. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources