Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 23;5(4):e10652.
doi: 10.2196/10652.

Real-World Technology Use Among People With Mental Illnesses: Qualitative Study

Elizabeth Carpenter-Song  1 , Valerie A Noel  2 , Stephanie C Acquilano  3 , Robert E Drake  2   3
Affiliations

Real-World Technology Use Among People With Mental Illnesses: Qualitative Study

Elizabeth Carpenter-Song et al. JMIR Ment Health. .

Abstract

Background: There is growing interest in using technology-based tools to support mental health recovery. Yet, despite evidence suggesting widespread access to technology among people with mental illnesses, interest in using technology to support mental health, and effectiveness of technology-based tools developed by researchers, such tools have not been widely adopted within mental health settings. Little is currently known about how mental health consumers are using technology to address mental health needs in real-world settings outside of controlled research studies.

Objective: This qualitative study examined current practices and orientations toward technology among consumers in 3 mental health settings in the United States.

Methods: Ethnographic observations and semistructured interviews were conducted. Observations focused on if and how technology was salient within the setting and documented relevant behaviors, interactions, and dialogue in fieldnotes. Ethnographic data informed the development of a semistructured interview that inquired into technology use and interest among consumers (n=15) in a community mental health setting. Fieldnotes and interview transcripts were reviewed and coded by multiple researchers. Key concepts and patterns identified were refined by the research team to develop the main findings.

Results: Ownership of technology, although common, was not ubiquitous and was varied across the sites. Participants had varying levels of awareness regarding the key capabilities of modern technologies. Participants used technology for many purposes, but there was limited evidence of technology use to support mental health. Technology-based tools specific to mental health were not routinely used, although some participants found widely available mobile apps to be helpful in recovery.

Conclusions: Qualitative findings suggest that many, but not all, clients will be interested in using technology to support mental health needs. The variability in type and quality of technology owned by participants suggests the need to design for a range of functionality in the development of mental health tools. Findings also suggest thinking broadly about using existing platforms and widely available tools to support consumers in mental health recovery.

Keywords: mental health; mobile phone; qualitative research; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Ben-Zeev D, Davis KE, Kaiser S, Krzsos I, Drake RE. Mobile technologies among people with serious mental illness: opportunities for future services. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013 Jul;40(4):340–3. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0424-x. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22648635 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colder Carras M, Mojtabai R, Furr-Holden CD, Eaton W, Cullen BAM. Use of mobile phones, computers and internet among clients of an inner-city community psychiatric clinic. J Psychiatr Pract. 2014 Dec;20(2):94–103. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000445244.08307.84. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24638044 00131746-201403000-00003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Firth J, Cotter J, Torous J, Bucci S, Firth JA, Yung AR. Mobile phone ownership and endorsement of “mHealth” among people with psychosis: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional Studies. Schizophr Bull. 2016 Mar;42(2):448–55. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv132. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26400871 sbv132 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torous J, Friedman R, Keshavan M. Smartphone ownership and interest in mobile applications to monitor symptoms of mental health conditions. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2014 Jan;2(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2994. http://mhealth.jmir.org/2014/1/e2/ v2i1e2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torous J, Firth J, Mueller N, Onnela JP, Baker JT. Methodology and reporting of mobile heath and smartphone application studies for schizophrenia. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2017;25(3):146–154. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000133. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28234658 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources