Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Mar-Apr;40(2):297-305.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Seong-Jang Kim et al. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the detection of cervical lymph node (LN) metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck squamous cell cancer (cN0 HNSCC) patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: The PubMed and EMBASE database, from the earliest available date of indexing through April 30, 2018, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for the detection of LN metastasis in cN0 HNSCC patients. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves.

Results: Across 18 studies (1044 patients), the pooled sensitivity for F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for the detection of LN metastasis was 0.58 and a pooled specificity of 0.87 for patient based analysis. Neck side based analysis showed the pooled sensitivity of 0.67 and a pooled specificity of 0.85. Level based study demonstrated the pooled sensitivity of 0.53 and a pooled specificity of 0.97 (95% CI; 0.95-0.98). In meta-regression analysis, no definite variable was the source of the study heterogeneity.

Conclusion: The current meta-analysis showed the low sensitivity and moderate specificity of F-18 FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical LN metastasis in cN0 HNSCC patients. Level based analysis of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT has a high specificity and NPV for the detection of cervical metastatic LN detection.

Keywords: F-18 FDG; Lymph node; PET; PET/CT: Head and neck cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources