Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Root Replacement - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 30473416
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.10.023
Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Root Replacement - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Mini-sternotomy has been proven superior to full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement by providing better perioperative outcomes. We investigated whether such technique provides better outcomes in patients undergoing aortic root surgery.
Methods: A comprehensive electronic literature search was undertaken among the four major databases (PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and EMBASE) to identify all published studies up to June 2018. The search terms used related to mini-sternotomy versus full sternotomy, aortic root, valve sparing, Bentall procedure. Only articles that compared mini against full sternotomy were considered in this analysis. After excluding articles based on title or abstract, the full text articles selected had reference lists searched for any potential further articles to be included in this review.
Results: A total of 2,765 patients were analysed from across eight comparative studies that were included in the quantitative analysis of the parameters of interest that fulfilled the criteria for meta-analysis. Mini-sternotomy aortic root replacement was associated with significantly shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (p=0.009), lower rate of blood transfusion (p=0.01). additionally, they had lower operative mortality (p=0.02), and shorter stay at intensive care and at hospital (p=0.0009, p=0.03 respectively). However, there was no difference between mini-sternotomy and conventional aortic root replacement in terms of aortic cross-clamp time (p=0.28), total operation time (p=0.31), re-exploration rate for bleeding (p=0.28), stroke rate (p=0.90), wound infection rate (p=0.96), and length of mechanical ventilation (p=0.10).
Conclusion: Mini-sternotomy is a safe, feasible alternative option to full sternotomy in aortic root repair. However, the significant heterogeneity in data points to the need for a larger, well-designed trial to support the currently limited literature evidences.
Keywords: Aortic root replacement; Aortic surgery; Mini access; Mini-sternotomy.
Copyright © 2018 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Current Trends in Aortic Root Surgery: The Mini-Bentall Approach.Innovations (Phila). 2018 Mar/Apr;13(2):91-96. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000476. Innovations (Phila). 2018. PMID: 29683812
-
[Minimally invasive approach vs full sternotomy for aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement: results from our center].Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2018 Jan-Jun;25(1-2):35-40. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2018. PMID: 30317708 Portuguese.
-
Mini-Bentall: An Interesting Approach for Selected Patients.Innovations (Phila). 2017 Jan/Feb;12(1):41-45. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000337. Innovations (Phila). 2017. PMID: 28129319
-
Minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;25(4):624-632. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx212. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017. PMID: 28962507 Review.
-
Aortic Valve Replacement: Is Minimally Invasive Really Better? A Contemporary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiol Rev. 2024 May-Jun 01;32(3):217-242. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000488. Epub 2022 Dec 28. Cardiol Rev. 2024. PMID: 36728720
Cited by
-
Minimally Invasive Aortic Root Surgery (Mini-Bentall): Case Series Study.Med Arch. 2025;79(3):233-236. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2025.79.233-236. Med Arch. 2025. PMID: 40657338 Free PMC article.
-
The mini-Bentall approach: Comparison with full sternotomy.JTCVS Tech. 2021 Jan 27;7:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.01.025. eCollection 2021 Jun. JTCVS Tech. 2021. PMID: 34318207 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond Conventional Operations: Embracing the Era of Contemporary Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 21;12(23):7210. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237210. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38068262 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Minimally invasive surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A multicenter study.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2019 Apr 28;23:100362. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100362. eCollection 2019 Jun. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2019. PMID: 31061875 Free PMC article.
-
Not All SAVR Are Created Equal: All the Approaches Available for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 24;12(3):84. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12030084. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025. PMID: 40137082 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources