Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 26:24:8524-8532.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.911766.

Effect of Age on Prognosis of Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma: A SEER Database Analysis

Affiliations

Effect of Age on Prognosis of Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma: A SEER Database Analysis

Jun Ren et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND Age is a prognostic factor for multiple malignancies. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of age on the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Information on patients with gastric SRC was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Chi-squared tests were used to demonstrate distribution differences, and Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were used to analyze the impact of age on CSS. RESULTS A total of 4596 patients were enrolled and divided into 3 subgroups according to age (<45, 45-74, and >74 years old). Higher percentages of T4, N2, and M1 disease were observed in the <45-year-old group (all P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier plots showed that the youngest group had the most favorable 5-year CSS rate (36.3%), which remained true after stratification according to tumor stage. Multivariate Cox regression models demonstrated a poorer survival outcome for >74-year-old than for <45-year-old patients (hazard ratio 1.841, 95% confidence interval 1.636-2.071; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Young age is associated with improved survival, even though younger patients generally present with a more advanced-stage disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival curves for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the gastric according to 3 age subgroups. χ2=46.838, P<0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival curves for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the gastric in tumor stage subgroups. (A) Stage I: χ2=54.738, P<0.001; (B) Stage II: χ2=8.339, P=0.015; (C) Stage III: χ2=91.76, P<0.001; (D) Stage IV: χ2=32.425, P<0.001.

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. - PubMed
    1. Flejou JF. [WHO classification of digestive tumors: The fourth edition]. Ann Pathol. 2011;31:S27–31. [in French] - PubMed
    1. Hass HG, Smith U, Jager C, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is significantly associated with poor prognosis and diffuse gastric cancer (lauren’s): Single-center experience of 160 cases. Onkologie. 2011;34:682–86. - PubMed
    1. Imamura T, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, et al. Early signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is related to favorable prognosis and low incidence of lymph node metastasis. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114:607–12. - PubMed
    1. Sano T, Aiko T. New japanese classifications and treatment guidelines for gastric cancer: Revision concepts and major revised points. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:97–100. - PubMed