Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May-Aug;12(2):67-84.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1248. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

Efficacy and Adverse Event Profile of the iStent and iStent Inject Trabecular Micro-bypass for Open-angle Glaucoma: A Meta-analysis

Affiliations

Efficacy and Adverse Event Profile of the iStent and iStent Inject Trabecular Micro-bypass for Open-angle Glaucoma: A Meta-analysis

Marko Popovic et al. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2018 May-Aug.

Abstract

Aim: This meta-analysis explores the efficacy and adverse event profile of the iStent, an ab interno implant for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma.

Methods: A systematic literature search of Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE was used to identify peer-reviewed original studies that provided efficacy data on the first or second generation iStent for at least five eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was the primary efficacy endpoint, while the number of medication classes was the secondary outcome. Weighted mean differences were reported for continuous endpoints, while a relative risk was computed for dichotomous variables.

Review results: The search revealed 545 results, of which 1767 eyes from 28 studies were included. The cohort age was 71.4 ± 5.4 years, and 44.9% of patients were male. There was a significantly greater IOP reduction after the use of two first-generation stents compared to one, irrespective of phacoemulsification status (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significantly greater IOP reduction following iStent alone relative to phaco-iStent for the first-generation iStent (p < 0.001) and the iStent inject (p < 0.001). For the first generation stent, combined phaco-iStent provided a greater level of IOP reduction (p < 0.001) and reduction in the number of medication classes relative to phacoemulsification alone (p < 0.001). In total, 22.5% of eyes that received iStent implantation sustained some type of adverse event. The most common adverse events were intraocular pressure elevation, stent blockage or obstruction, stent malposition and hyphema.

Conclusion and clinical significance: Statistically significant differences in efficacy outcomes exist between different numbers of stents and the presence or absence of concurrent phacoemulsification.How to cite this article: Popovic M, Campos-Moller X, Saheb H, Ahmed IIK. Efficacy and Adverse Event Profile of the iStent and iStent Inject Trabecular Micro-bypass for Open-angle Glaucoma: A Meta-analysis. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2018;12(2):67-84.

Keywords: Glaucoma; Meta-analysis; Surgical instruments; Clinical efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: Consultant to Glaukos and Allergan.

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
Modified preferred reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram
Fig. 2A:
Fig. 2A:
Number of first generation iStents-IOP
Fig. 2B:
Fig. 2B:
Number of First Generation iStents-number of medication classes
Fig. 3A:
Fig. 3A:
First generation phaco-iStent versus iStent alone-IOP
Fig. 3B:
Fig. 3B:
First generation phaco-iStent versus iStent alone-number of medication classes
Fig. 4A:
Fig. 4A:
First generation phaco-iStent versus phacoemulsification alone-IOP
Fig. 4B:
Fig. 4B:
First generation phaco-iStent versus phacoemulsification alone-number of medication classes
Fig. 5A:
Fig. 5A:
Second generation phaco-iStent versus iStent alone-IOP
Fig. 5B:
Fig. 5B:
Second generation phaco-iStent versus iStent alone-number of medication classes

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cook C, Foster P. Epidemiology of glaucoma: what’s new? Can J Ophthalmol. 2012;47(3):223–226. - PubMed
    1. Bressler Susan B, Quigley Harry A, Schein Oliver D. Vision January 1, 2007. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Health; 2007.
    1. Samuelson TW, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Duh YJ, Giamporcaro JE. Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:459–467. - PubMed
    1. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Komaroff E. Factors for progression and glaucoma treatment: the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:102–106. - PubMed
    1. Craven ER, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Giamporcaro JE. Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1339–1345. - PubMed