Skin cancer of the nose: options for reconstruction
- PMID: 3047498
- DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930390102
Skin cancer of the nose: options for reconstruction
Abstract
The nose is the most common site of skin cancer on the human body. This review was compiled to enumerate the many reconstructive techniques which are available and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Five hundred twenty-one patients with nasal cancer were treated at Roswell Park Memorial Institute from 1964 to 1981. Four hundred five patients were treated by cryotherapy, electrocautery, chemosurgery, radiation therapy, or local excision with primary closure. Forty-six patients were treated with simple nasolabial flaps. The remaining 70 patients underwent more extensive resections and reconstructions. Their records were reviewed. At 5 years the local recurrence rate was 3% for basal cell carcinoma and 20% for squamous cell carcinoma. The multiple reconstructive techniques which were utilized in these patients are discussed. Skin-grafting procedures were used to manage 51% of the patients. Prostheses were used in 9%. Multiple different reconstructive flaps were used for the remaining 40% of the patients. The management of large nasal carcinomas must be individualized with therapeutic decisions being made by a practitioner who is familiar with the many reconstructive options. This will ensure the optimal functional and aesthetic result for each patient.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Patients Who Underwent Nasal Reconstruction After Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Excision.J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1299-303. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001563. J Craniofac Surg. 2015. PMID: 26080180
-
Titanium mesh in reconstructive surgery of the nasal pyramid. Follow-up of our 11 initial cases.Int J Dermatol. 2015 Aug;54(8):961-5. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12971. Int J Dermatol. 2015. PMID: 26183244
-
[Reconstruction of the nose after oncological operations].Otolaryngol Pol. 2009 Mar-Apr;63(2):122-5. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6657(09)70091-5. Otolaryngol Pol. 2009. PMID: 19681481 Polish.
-
Nasal reconstruction--beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Nov;114(6):1405-16; discussion 1417-9. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138596.57393.05. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004. PMID: 15509926 Review.
-
Skin and Composite Grafting Techniques in Facial Reconstruction for Skin Cancer.Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2017 Aug;25(3):347-363. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2017.03.007. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28676162 Review.
Cited by
-
Cutaneous lesions of the nose.Head Face Med. 2010 Jun 4;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-6-7. Head Face Med. 2010. PMID: 20525327 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Application of FACE-Q and NOSE in Nasal Reconstruction with Paramedian Frontal Flap after Skin Cancer Resection.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Apr 8;9(4):e3533. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003533. eCollection 2021 Apr. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021. PMID: 33854868 Free PMC article.
-
Paramedian forehead flap in the treatment of nasal, non-melanoma skin cancer: a cross-sectional study.Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022 Sep 2;49:e20223034. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223034-en. eCollection 2022. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022. PMID: 36074390 Free PMC article.
-
The Tree Flap: A Novel Modification of the Hatchet Flap for Lower One-third Nasal Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Apr 15;12(4):e5738. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005738. eCollection 2024 Apr. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 38623444 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical