Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):558-570.
doi: 10.1093/geront/gny146.

Fit & Strong! Plus Trial Outcomes for Obese Older Adults with Osteoarthritis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Fit & Strong! Plus Trial Outcomes for Obese Older Adults with Osteoarthritis

Susan L Hughes et al. Gerontologist. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: We compared the effectiveness of standard Fit & Strong! (F&S!; targets physical activity [PA]) to Fit & Strong! Plus (F&S! Plus; targets PA and dietary weight loss) on weight, diet quality, and PA outcomes.

Research design and methods: We randomly assigned 413 overweight older adults with OA to the F&S! or F&S! Plus programs and assessed outcomes at 2 and 6 months.

Results: The F&S! Plus group lost -2.0 ± 0.2 kg (mean ± SE, 2% of starting weight) at 2 months that was maintained at 6 months. Two- and 6-month BMI and waist circumference improved significantly in the F&S! Plus group (p < .001). Diet quality at 2 months showed greater improvement in the F&S! Plus group: 4.6 ± 0.7 versus 2.0 ± 0.7, p = .006, with no significant difference between groups at 6 months. The F&S! Plus group differentially improved on PA engagement at 2 months and at 2 and 6 months in joint pain (6-month mean ± SE: -1.5 ± 0.3 vs -0.6 ± 0.3, p = .02), function (-4.7 ± 0.9 vs -1.5 ± 0.9, p = .01), and 6-min walk test (29.5 ± 5.1 m vs 14.1 ± 5.2 m, p = .04).

Discussion and implications: Adding a dietary weight loss component to F&S! achieved weight and waist circumference benefits that were maintained at 6 months. Importantly, the weight loss was accompanied by clinically meaningful improvements in OA symptoms and mobility. Future work should investigate minimum thresholds for weight reduction that improve long-term function in this population.

Keywords: Arthritis; Comparative effectiveness trial; Physical activity; Weight management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participant flow.

References

    1. Altman R., Asch E., Bloch D., Bole G., Borenstein D., Brandt K.,…Hochberg M (1986). Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 29, 1039–1049. - PubMed
    1. Anderson K. O., Green C. R., & Payne R (2009). Racial and ethnic disparities in pain: Causes and consequences of unequal care. The Journal of Pain: Official Journal of the American Pain Society, 10, 1187–1204. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bandura A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184. - PubMed
    1. Barbour K. E., Helmick C. G., Boring M., & Brady T. J (2017). Vital signs: Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation—United States, 2013–2015. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66, 246–253. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6609e1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellamy N., Buchanan W. W., Goldsmith C. H., Campbell J., & Stitt L. W (1988). Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The Journal of Rheumatology, 15, 1833–1840. - PubMed

Publication types